2000
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence

Abstract: This chapter recasts evaluation use in terms of influence and proposes an integrated theory that conceptualizes evaluation influence in three dimensions—source, intention, and time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
307
0
17

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
307
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Kirkhart (2000) introduced the notion of evaluation influence as an important area of study. She defines influence as "the capacity or power of persons or things to produce effects on others by intangible or indirect means" (p. 7).…”
Section: Evaluation Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kirkhart (2000) introduced the notion of evaluation influence as an important area of study. She defines influence as "the capacity or power of persons or things to produce effects on others by intangible or indirect means" (p. 7).…”
Section: Evaluation Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aware/Unintended UnauuarelUnintended AWARENESS > TIME SOURCE Figure 4: Evaluation Impact Within the Program Context (adapted from Kirkhart, 2000) Our argument is based on the conviction that the informed, user-oriented evaluator as a part of the evaluation is able to impact users and contexts and therefore has some potential for increasing the possibility of use (of all kinds, including process use). Because, by definition, influence is unintended, it is outside the domain of the evaluator to affect such possible evaluation influences.…”
Section: Aware/ Intendedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case study also indicates an evaluation process that had an unintended influence (see Kirkhart, 2000). By allowing the group to take on a task-related discussion, programmatic changes were made that could not be specifically predicted.…”
Section: The Evaluator In the Role Of Facilitatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 28 (11):2095-2105, nov, 2012 e ações preexistentes) 6 ; aos tipos de influência -fonte (processo ou resultado), intenção (prevista ou inesperada) e tempo (imediato, por ciclos ou de longo prazo) 7 ; e níveis de influência da avaliação -individual (aquisição ou aprimoramento de atitudes, habilidades e condutas pelos envolvidos na avaliação), interpessoal (persuasão de pares, reconhecimento ou aprimoramento de lideranças, mudança de opinião dos envolvidos e de normas na organização), e coletivo (incorporação da cultura e dos achados das avaliaões na agenda política da organização) 8,9 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified