2021
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing large interaction networks from empirical time series data

Abstract: Reconstructing interactions from observational data is a critical need for investigating natural biological networks, wherein network dimensionality is usually high. However, these pose a challenge to existing methods that can quantify only small interaction networks. Here, we proposed a novel approach to reconstruct high‐dimensional interaction Jacobian networks using empirical time series without specific model assumptions. This method, named “multiview distance regularised S‐map,” generalised the state spac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our analyses based on CCM cannot access the sign of feedbacks (i.e., positive or negative), although it is known that the sign is important in determining the response of feedbacks to external perturbations (e.g., amplified or dampened). Although methods to estimate the sign of interactions were proposed (e.g., S-map 22 , 57 ), the robustness of these methods has not been thoroughly examined 58 . Lastly, due to limitations of data availability, our analysis only quantified causal strength across systems at a consensus monthly scale, acknowledging that state-space reconstruction methods (e.g., CCM) are scale-dependent 59 , e.g., one causal driver dominated monthly might not necessarily dominate at other time scales.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our analyses based on CCM cannot access the sign of feedbacks (i.e., positive or negative), although it is known that the sign is important in determining the response of feedbacks to external perturbations (e.g., amplified or dampened). Although methods to estimate the sign of interactions were proposed (e.g., S-map 22 , 57 ), the robustness of these methods has not been thoroughly examined 58 . Lastly, due to limitations of data availability, our analysis only quantified causal strength across systems at a consensus monthly scale, acknowledging that state-space reconstruction methods (e.g., CCM) are scale-dependent 59 , e.g., one causal driver dominated monthly might not necessarily dominate at other time scales.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ESNs have been applied to causal analysis [Huang et al 2020, Duggento et al 2021, Wang et al 2022], we developed for the first time a reliable method of causal network inference by integrating adaptive online ESNs [Jaeger 2002] into an ensemble machine learning framework. In addition to its applicability to nonlinear dynamics, our approach is not affected by the reliability of nonlinear prediction methods on arbitrary underlying dynamics, which differs from previous approaches based on nonlinear time series analysis [Sugihara et al 2012, Suzuki et al 2017, Ushio et al 2018, Cenci et al 2019, Chang et al 2021]. As we have confirmed (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…the number of data points is more than or roughly equal to the square of the dimensions of reconstructed state space, which is required for robust estimations of the S-map coefficients). Note that, in the case that the number of dimensions far exceeds the number of data points, a recently proposed S-map method would be more suitable [ 25 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%