2016
DOI: 10.3961/jpmph.16.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of Radiation Dose Received by Diagnostic Radiologic Technologists in Korea

Abstract: ObjectivesDiagnostic medical radiation workers in Korea have been officially monitored for their occupational radiation doses since 1996. The purpose of this study was to design models for reconstructing unknown individual radiation doses to which diagnostic radiation technologists were exposed before 1996.MethodsRadiation dose reconstruction models were developed by using cross-sectional survey data and the personal badge doses of 8167 radiologic technologists. The models included calendar year and age as pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quarterly doses below 0.01 mSv, which is the lowest detectable level of NDR, were assigned at value of 0.005 mSv – the midpoint between 0.01 mSv and zero at the dose reconstruction. For workers who started working with radiation before 1996 ( n = 13,178; 14.0% of the total enrollees in the NDR), historical badge doses were reconstructed using a model in which annual doses were determined as a log-linear function of time and age [ 18 ]. The age at the time of first exposure was estimated for each sex and occupational group using the findings of our previous survey [ 19 ] to determine the first year of radiologic practice for individual workers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quarterly doses below 0.01 mSv, which is the lowest detectable level of NDR, were assigned at value of 0.005 mSv – the midpoint between 0.01 mSv and zero at the dose reconstruction. For workers who started working with radiation before 1996 ( n = 13,178; 14.0% of the total enrollees in the NDR), historical badge doses were reconstructed using a model in which annual doses were determined as a log-linear function of time and age [ 18 ]. The age at the time of first exposure was estimated for each sex and occupational group using the findings of our previous survey [ 19 ] to determine the first year of radiologic practice for individual workers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 For individuals who were working before 1984, radiation doses were not documented; therefore, we will estimate their historical occupational exposure using a dose reconstruction model that includes predictors such as age, sex and work place. 29 For using individual radiation doses to analyse a dose–response relationship, we will use organ absorbed doses estimated from the effective dose from the external exposure in the National Dose Registry. Absorbed organ dose is estimated based on methods using the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 116 organ dose conversion coefficients and irradiation geometry factors, 30 considering information about work practices, such as use of protective devices and badge location, from the nationwide survey as suggested by the Million Worker Study 31 and the USRT study.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiation doses were not documented for individuals who were working before 1996; therefore, we will estimate their historical occupational exposed doses, by applying our previous methods, using a dose reconstruction model that includes predictors, such as age, gender and workplace. 33 …”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%