2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002380050250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of the anterior floor of the mouth with the inferiorly based nasolabial flap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flap success rate was 100% with no total or partial flap loss in spite of re exploration of one patient for the evacuation of a reactionary haemorrhage where the flap was resutured again without any effect on the vascularity. Such results compare favourably with the reported studies [3,22,24,25] where the incidence of partial flap loss was ranged from 5% to 6.5%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The flap success rate was 100% with no total or partial flap loss in spite of re exploration of one patient for the evacuation of a reactionary haemorrhage where the flap was resutured again without any effect on the vascularity. Such results compare favourably with the reported studies [3,22,24,25] where the incidence of partial flap loss was ranged from 5% to 6.5%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Others reported no effect of ligation of facial artery even with prior radiotherapy [25]. In the present study all of our patients did not have radiotherapy preoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Their advantages include a short operative time and little donor site morbidity. 4,5 However, local flaps are too bulky to situate in the right position and fit to the defect site. 6 If the defect is not reconstructed well, food transport without aspiration, natural speech, and breathing might be impossible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that a lengthy and complex reconstruction is always not needed for small intraoral defects and the nasolabial flap offers a safe and simple alternative. [6] The largest publication of nasolabial flaps was by Varghese et al in 2001 of their series of 224 cases in which more complications were reported in post-irradiated cases than in primary (p=0.03). [7] Maurer et al in 2002, in their series of 26 patients reported that 23 patients (88%) underwent successful prosthetic rehabilitation after reconstruction of defects about the size of 5/5 cm caused due to resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior floor of the mouth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%