2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05628-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recruitment gain of spinal motor neuron pools in cat and human

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soleus MSRs were as usual evoked by stimulating the tibial nerve, but while the participant held a small voluntary plantarflexion to activate tonic firing of a few single motor units. The size of the MSR was set to just above reflex threshold (and when the M-wave was < 5% of maximum) so that single motor units at the time of the MSR could be distinguished from the compound potential from many units that make up the MSR (Nielsen et al, 2019). For a given trial run, test MSRs were evoked every 3-5 s for the first 100 s and then MSR testing continued for a further 100s, but with a cDP-conditioning train (50 ms, 200 Hz) applied 500 ms prior to each MSR testing stimulation.…”
Section: Conditioning Of the Msrs In Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soleus MSRs were as usual evoked by stimulating the tibial nerve, but while the participant held a small voluntary plantarflexion to activate tonic firing of a few single motor units. The size of the MSR was set to just above reflex threshold (and when the M-wave was < 5% of maximum) so that single motor units at the time of the MSR could be distinguished from the compound potential from many units that make up the MSR (Nielsen et al, 2019). For a given trial run, test MSRs were evoked every 3-5 s for the first 100 s and then MSR testing continued for a further 100s, but with a cDP-conditioning train (50 ms, 200 Hz) applied 500 ms prior to each MSR testing stimulation.…”
Section: Conditioning Of the Msrs In Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under normal conditions, Henneman's size principle suggests that Ia afferents first activate slow motor units, such that motor units producing the smallest force are recruited the earliest (Henneman, 1957;Burke & Rymer, 1976;Harrison & Taylor, 1981). However, increasing the recruitment gain of the motor pool induces a fast and synchronous activation of the entire motoneuronal pool (Nielsen et al 2019), which contributes to further increase the excitability of the H-reflex (Kernell & Hultborn, 1990). This effect can be the consequence of several factors, including: 1) homogenization of motor unit properties; 2) increased inhibition biased towards slow motor units; 3) increased excitation biased towards large faster motor units; 4) a combination of these factors (Kernell & Hultborn, 1990).…”
Section: H-reflex Hyperexcitability Is Associated With a Concurrent Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change rate of TA and PN was also compared in affected limbs of stroke patients. 4. In order to eliminate the effect of gravity on foot inversion caused by the biomechanics characteristics of the ankle joint when both the TA and PN were paralyzed (foot drop with foot inversion), we deliberately analyzed the ability of voluntary ankle dorsiflexion stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this phenomenon remains elusive, deserving further researches on its pathophysiological mechanism. It is well known that the recovery of motor function is closely related to the spinal neural excitability (4,5). After stroke occurs, motor neurons with relatively higher excitability tend to be excited by the residual descending impulses of the pyramidal tracts or extrapyramidal systems, causing voluntary contraction or spasticity of the corresponding muscles (6), while motor neurons with relatively lower excitability are unable to be excited and remained paralyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%