2006 IFIP International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration 2006
DOI: 10.1109/vlsisoc.2006.313220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Instrumentation and Optimized Fault Injection Control for Dependability Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the major drawback of using simulation techniques is the time consuming effort resulting from the huge computational power required to perform circuit simulation under a large number of faulty conditions. Emulation-based fault injection techniques have been proposed in past years with the objective of accelerating fault injections campaigns [16][17][18][19]. Features present in FPGAs like reconfiguration and readback capabilities are used to increase the observability and controllability of a circuit under test (CUT), making FPGAs important tools for fault injection emulation.…”
Section: Validation Via Fault Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the major drawback of using simulation techniques is the time consuming effort resulting from the huge computational power required to perform circuit simulation under a large number of faulty conditions. Emulation-based fault injection techniques have been proposed in past years with the objective of accelerating fault injections campaigns [16][17][18][19]. Features present in FPGAs like reconfiguration and readback capabilities are used to increase the observability and controllability of a circuit under test (CUT), making FPGAs important tools for fault injection emulation.…”
Section: Validation Via Fault Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As all the Flip-Flops (FFs) that constitute the pipeline registers are chip-enabled it is necessary to control both their data input and their chipenable input. As a consequence we have extended the solution proposed in [5]. For each targeted FF, it consists in inserting extra logic so as to invert the value memorized.…”
Section: A General Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in which FF the fault has to be injected) and to load these data in parallel. The injection controller is further detailed in [5]. For our experiments the board used is a Xilinx ML310 and the embedded processor is a hard processor core, the PowerPC core embedded in the Virtex2Pro FPGA.…”
Section: A General Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the circuit is instrumented. The instrumentation is performed on the netlist generated by the synthesis of the RT-Ievel description, using an extension of the solution described in [12] that also allows us to inject bit-flips in flip-flops (FFs) with an Enable signal [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in which FF the fault has to be injected) and to load these data in parallel. The injection controller is further detailed in [12]. For our experiments the board used is a Xilinx MUIO and the embedded processor is a hard processor core, the PowerPC core embedded in the Virtex2Pro FPGA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%