Reducing Elevator Energy Use: A Comparison of Posted Feedback and Reduced Elevator Convenience

Abstract

The effects of two different procedures for reducing elevator energy use were assessed using a multiple-baseline design. In the first procedure, feedback about the amount of energy consumed by the elevators each week was posted on each elevator door. Later, signs advocating the use of stairs to save energy and improve health were posted next to the feedback signs. In the second procedure, the time required to travel between floors was increased by adding a delay to the elevator door closing mechanisms. Results indicated that neither feedback alone nor feedback plus educational signs reduced the amount of energy consumed by the elevators. However, use of the door delay reduced consumption by one-third in all elevators.A second experiment replicated the effect of the door delay on energy consumption and, in addition, demonstrated that the door delay also produced a reduction in the number of persons using the elevator. The second experiment also showed that, following an initial period during which a full delay was in effect, a gradual reduction of the delay interval resulted in continued energy conservation. Reduced convenience as a general strategy for energy conservation is discussed.

Elevator availability and its impact on stair use in a workplace

“…The resultant increase in the alternative option, namely the stairs, is consistent with effects of barriers to elevator use provided by structural aspects of the building (Nicoll & Zimring, 2009) or slowing of door closing time (van Houten, Nau & Merrigan, 1981). Demands on the elevators will affect the speed at which they travel between floors, and hence their availability at the choice point.…”

“…Reconfiguring the elevators in existing buildings such that they travel more slowly is likely to increase stair use just as slowing door closing increased stair use in an earlier study (van Houten et al, 1981). If possible, the more radical reconfiguring of 18 multiple elevators so that some do not stop at every floor, i.e.…”

Visual Prompts or Volunteer Models: An Experiment in Recycling

“…Modeling is known to be more consistent in effectiveness compared signs [21], and visual prompts [33]. A combination of modelers and signs has been shown to work well in three small-scale studies [34][35][36].…”

Applied Behavior Analysis: Understanding and Changing Behavior in the Community—A Representative Review

“…Other research demonstrated that university faculty increased the use of window coverings to reduce energy consumption at night when prompts and feedback were provided (Luyben, 1984). Another study showed that increasing the delay between calling for the elevator and the arrival of the elevator reduced energy use and increased the use of stairs (Van Houten, Nau, & Merrigan, 1981). In an early study incentives offered to college students for reduced driving produced significant reductions in odometer readings during a 28-day intervention (Foxx & Hake, 1977).…”