2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Interfacial Resistance by Na-SiO2 Composite Anode for NASICON-Based Solid-State Sodium Battery

Abstract: Room-temperature solid-state sodium batteries (SSBs) are viewed as one of the most promising candidates for next-generation energy storage devices because of their cost-effectiveness, safety performance, and high energy density. Na + ion superionic conductor (NASICON) type solid electrolyte (SE) shows great perspective due to its high ionic conductivity at room temperature. However, the high interfacial resistance between Na metal anode and NASICON SE is still thwarting the stable operation of SSBs. In this wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the total resistance starts to decrease until cycling at 1.0 mA cm −2 (Figure 3f and Figure S11c, Supporting Information) and ultimately shows a high CCD of 1.4 mA cm −2 , which to our best knowledge is the top‐level among reported NASICON‐based SSEs in published literatures up to now (Figure 3g). [ 37–41 ] It also shows excellent long‐term galvanostatic cycling stability at RT. As shown in Figure 3h, the Na/SPAN‐NASICON/Na cell delivers a stable cycling performance for up to 500 h at 0.1 and 0.25 mA cm −2 , further confirming the effective suppression of dendrites growth and highly improved cycling stability among anode–electrolyte interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the total resistance starts to decrease until cycling at 1.0 mA cm −2 (Figure 3f and Figure S11c, Supporting Information) and ultimately shows a high CCD of 1.4 mA cm −2 , which to our best knowledge is the top‐level among reported NASICON‐based SSEs in published literatures up to now (Figure 3g). [ 37–41 ] It also shows excellent long‐term galvanostatic cycling stability at RT. As shown in Figure 3h, the Na/SPAN‐NASICON/Na cell delivers a stable cycling performance for up to 500 h at 0.1 and 0.25 mA cm −2 , further confirming the effective suppression of dendrites growth and highly improved cycling stability among anode–electrolyte interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a Na–SiO 2 composite electrode showed decreased surface tension and enhanced contact of the SE with Na metal. [ 179 ] As shown in Figure 17b, this composite electrode showed SE/Na metal charge‐transfer resistance that decreased to 101 − cm 2 , thereby achieving an excellent Na–SiO 2 /Na–SiO 2 symmetric cell. Besides oxides, MoS 2 also has been introduced for Na metal protection to enhance Na stripping.…”
Section: Sodium Metal Anode and Interface Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reproduced with permission. [ 179 ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. c) Schematic illustration of Na x MoS 2 –C‐BASE triple interface and the electrochemical results for ASSBs.…”
Section: Sodium Metal Anode and Interface Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[65] Moreover, improving the wettability of sodium metal itself by forming alloys is also helpful for good sodium anode/SSE interface. Fu et al [66] fabricated a NaÀ SiO 2 composite anode by introducing amorphous SiO 2 into Na metal, which obtained reduced surface tension and got sufficient contact with NASICON SSEs compared with pristine Na metal (Figure 8d). The symmetric cell assembled by NASICON SSEs and NaÀ SiO 2 electrodes possessed dramatically reduced charge transfer resistance, which was mainly attributed to the improved physical contact between composite electrodes and SSEs.…”
Section: Anode/sse Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, improving the wettability of sodium metal itself by forming alloys is also helpful for good sodium anode/SSE interface. Fu et al [66] . fabricated a Na−SiO 2 composite anode by introducing amorphous SiO 2 into Na metal, which obtained reduced surface tension and got sufficient contact with NASICON SSEs compared with pristine Na metal (Figure 8d).…”
Section: Interface Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%