2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Radiation Dose and Improving Image Quality in CT Portal Venography Using 80 kV and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V in Slender Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 When reducing the tube voltage, the IN can be increased, and the SNR or CNR can be decreased. 18 However, our study showed that IN, SNR, and CNR were not significantly different between groups A and B. This is a result of using the ASiR (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…17 When reducing the tube voltage, the IN can be increased, and the SNR or CNR can be decreased. 18 However, our study showed that IN, SNR, and CNR were not significantly different between groups A and B. This is a result of using the ASiR (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Seung et al [25] showed that the use of 80 kV could reduce the radiation dose by 45.2% with comparable or improved image quality in patients with abdominal tumors. Ren et al [22] showed that in contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the abdomen, the 80 kV scanning scheme reduced the radiation dose by 63.3% and improved the quality of portal vein images in lean patients compared to the conventional 120 kV scanning scheme. Li et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the portal vein image depends on the enhancement degree of the portal vein and the contrast between the portal vein and its surrounding liver parenchyma. It is common to improve the contrast ratio of the portal vein by increasing the amount and iodine concentration of the contrast agent when doctors need to observe the portal vein and its relationship with adjacent lesions in clinical work [ 17 ], similar to the scan protocol of Group B in this study. The comparison of Group A without CE-boost and Group B illustrated this, and most branches of the portal vein in Group B appeared brighter than those in Group A without CE-boost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the contrast agent concentration and total dose is not the preferred method to improve the image quality of the portal vein. Many efforts have been made to reduce the amount of contrast media as much as possible while maintaining portal vein image quality [ 17 , 20 ]. Han et al [ 21 ] used lower monoenergetic images combined with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) in dual-energy spectral CT to reduce the iodine amount in CT portal venography (CTPV).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%