1981
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduction in clinical assessment time using computer algorithms

Abstract: A new mathematical procedure (BIDALGO) is suggested for application to the psychological testing field. BIDALGO, similar to past adaptive testing methods, is compared both with MMPI short-form efforts and applications in the educational testing literature. A comparison is also made between linear regression models used in past efforts and the Bayesian decision models used in BIDALGO. The requirements for an MMPI application are delineated, emphasizing branching procedures for specific scales and difficulties e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications of tailored testing have been successful in reducing testing time by about 50% (Spinetti & Hambleton, 1977) to 75% (English et al, 1977). Tailored testing has been used with head-injury and stroke patients (Watts, Baddeley, & Williams, 1982) and has also been applied in personality assessment (Lyons & Brown, 1981).…”
Section: Innovative Use Of Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of tailored testing have been successful in reducing testing time by about 50% (Spinetti & Hambleton, 1977) to 75% (English et al, 1977). Tailored testing has been used with head-injury and stroke patients (Watts, Baddeley, & Williams, 1982) and has also been applied in personality assessment (Lyons & Brown, 1981).…”
Section: Innovative Use Of Computersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing availability of computer technology, the market for computerized psychological testing has expanded rapidly in recent years (Erdman, Greist, Klein, Jefferson, & Getto, 1981; Johnson & Johnson, 1981; Lyons & Brown, 1981; Space, 1981). However, a number of practices suggest that some users are not aware of the limitations and ethical issues that accompany computerized test administration, scoring, and interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%