2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference points and approximation algorithms in multicriteria discrete optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ), and 1NM (f 4 1 , f 2 2 ). In Figure 6, one non-dominated approach is observed: 1NM-ε Inc (f 4 1 , f 1 2 ). These results demonstrate that the a priori multi-objective scalarization methods can be used to improve TTP and AMS over a rolling horizon compared to a single-objective approach.…”
Section: Rolling Horizon Results: Semiconductormentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 ), and 1NM (f 4 1 , f 2 2 ). In Figure 6, one non-dominated approach is observed: 1NM-ε Inc (f 4 1 , f 1 2 ). These results demonstrate that the a priori multi-objective scalarization methods can be used to improve TTP and AMS over a rolling horizon compared to a single-objective approach.…”
Section: Rolling Horizon Results: Semiconductormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast to a posteriori methods, the DM's preferences are selected in advance in a priori methods; hence, a single trade-off solution is obtained after a unique search [10,15], rather than a set of solutions for the DM to evaluate. Reference point methods, such as compromise programming [46], are very popular a priori methods that have been widely used in practice [16,4].…”
Section: Background and Literature Review On Multi-objective Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results belong to the fast-growing study of multi-criteria optimization [5,6,13]. Since 2011, we looked at the relationships between different parameters of decision trees and the construction of Pareto optimal points [7,9,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypervolume scalarization shows some similarities with other reference point based methods like, e.g., compromise programming techniques which were introduced by Bowman (1976) and Yu (1973); Freimer and Yu (1976) in the context of group decisions. See also Büsing et al (2017) for recent research on reference point methods in the context of approximations of discrete multiobjective optimization problems.While compromise programming models typically aim at the minimization of the distance of an outcome vector from a given (utopian) reference point, e.g., based on p -norms, the hypervolume scalarization aims at maximizing the volume dominated by an outcome vector w.r.t. a given reference point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%