2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference value for the TUGT in healthy older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
16
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the aim of this study was to address the two gaps identified above by examining the impact of IMU location on lower limb joint angle accuracy while participants perform multiple functionally relevant movements. Participants performed the Timed-Up-And-Go (TUG) test given its extensive validation in clinical populations and the variety of functional movements performed [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Eleven sensor positions on the torso, thigh, shank, and foot were chosen based on commonly reported locations in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the aim of this study was to address the two gaps identified above by examining the impact of IMU location on lower limb joint angle accuracy while participants perform multiple functionally relevant movements. Participants performed the Timed-Up-And-Go (TUG) test given its extensive validation in clinical populations and the variety of functional movements performed [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Eleven sensor positions on the torso, thigh, shank, and foot were chosen based on commonly reported locations in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TUGT test is a common method to observe patient's balance motor function and daily activities, and is an important index to evaluate patient's prognosis. [32] Although the physical tness of EC patients was affected to a certain extent due to the operation, analysis of this study showed that the time of TUGT in the IG (13.224.05) was signi cantly shorter than the CG (16.135.42) when discharged after the intervention of ERP. The frailty scores was range from 1 to 4, there were signi cant statistical differences between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…TUGT test is a common method to observe patient's balance motor function and daily activities, and is an important index to evaluate patient's prognosis. [18] Although the physical tness of EC patients was affected to a certain extent due to the operation, analysis of this study showed that the time of TUGT in the IG (13.224.05) was signi cantly shorter than the CG (16.135.42) when discharged after the intervention of t-ECRP. The frailty scores was range from 1 to 4, there were signi cant statistical differences between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%