2014
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12121.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reframing the Debate on Language Separation: Toward a Vision for Translanguaging Pedagogies in the Dual Language Classroom

Abstract: The policy of strict separation of languages for academic instruction dominates dual language bilingual education programming. This article explores the dynamic bilingual practices of two experienced bilingual teachers in a two-way dual language public school in Texas and contributes to current research problematizing language separation. Data included interviews, field notes, and classroom interaction video in a pre-kindergarten and a first grade classroom. The instructional practices of the two teachers sugg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Levitt, 2002), middle (e.g., Hofer & Swan, 2008;Martin et al, 2001), and secondary (e.g., Alazzi, 2008;Chiodo & Tsai, 1997;Vetter, 2010) teachers. Among these studies, multiple content areas were investigated, including ELA (e.g., Camburn & Barnes, 2004;Flynn & Schachter, 2017;Hamel, 2003;Maloch, 2002;Worthy et al, 2015), science (e.g., Diezmann & Watters, 2015;Levitt, 2002;Savasci & Berlin, 2012), and social studies (e.g., Alazzi, 2008;Hofer & Swan, 2008), with researchers examining a variety of practices such as grouping students (e.g., Maloch et al, 2013), using technology in the classroom (e.g., Hughes & Ooms, 2004;Swan & Hofer, 2011), and working with dual language learners (DLL; e.g., Gersten, 1999;Musanti, 2017;Musanti et al, 2009;Palmer et al, 2014). In terms of topical focus, we noted three broad groups of research questions that guided the studies: questions focused on classroom practices (n = 33), particular groups of teachers (e.g., novice, Latinx; n = 16), or the implementation or uptake professional development (n = 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Levitt, 2002), middle (e.g., Hofer & Swan, 2008;Martin et al, 2001), and secondary (e.g., Alazzi, 2008;Chiodo & Tsai, 1997;Vetter, 2010) teachers. Among these studies, multiple content areas were investigated, including ELA (e.g., Camburn & Barnes, 2004;Flynn & Schachter, 2017;Hamel, 2003;Maloch, 2002;Worthy et al, 2015), science (e.g., Diezmann & Watters, 2015;Levitt, 2002;Savasci & Berlin, 2012), and social studies (e.g., Alazzi, 2008;Hofer & Swan, 2008), with researchers examining a variety of practices such as grouping students (e.g., Maloch et al, 2013), using technology in the classroom (e.g., Hughes & Ooms, 2004;Swan & Hofer, 2011), and working with dual language learners (DLL; e.g., Gersten, 1999;Musanti, 2017;Musanti et al, 2009;Palmer et al, 2014). In terms of topical focus, we noted three broad groups of research questions that guided the studies: questions focused on classroom practices (n = 33), particular groups of teachers (e.g., novice, Latinx; n = 16), or the implementation or uptake professional development (n = 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual data were collected through video recordings of practice (e.g., Drake & Sherin, 2006;Machado et al, 2017;Worthy et al, 2015), field notes regarding classroom practices (e.g., Levitt, 2002;Musanti & Celedón-Pattichis, 2013;Watters & Ginns, 1997), and photographs taken by teachers (e.g., Souto-Manning, 2010). Some researchers also collected visual documentation of products of practice, such as student work (e.g., Hofer & Swan, 2008;Maloch, 2008;Palmer et al, 2014), lesson plans (e.g., Hofer & Swan, 2008;Maloch, 2004), or curriculum standards (e.g., Alazzi, 2008). Importantly, just over half of the studies utilized audio and/or video recordings of classroom practice (n = 32); the rest relied solely on researcher observation via field notes (n = 20).…”
Section: Rq1: Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students should be positioned as capable multilingual individuals with the ability to use all of their linguistic resources in the learning process (Palmer, Martínez, Mateus, & Henderson, 2014).…”
Section: Pedagogical Translanguagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By viewing language as a resource rather than a problem, teachers can engage their students more fully in learning (García, Sylva, & Witt, 2011;Gort & Sembiante, 2015;Orellana & García, 2014;Palmer, Martínez, Mateus, & Henderson, 2014). As Palmer, Martínez, Mateus, and Henderson, write, "more and more educators are beginning to consider the capacity to communicate in languages other than English as an asset to be developed in school: an academic advantage that can lead to bilingualism, biculturalism, and biliteracy" (2014, p. 757).…”
Section: Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%