2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional aboveground biomass equations for North American arid and semi-arid forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with the findings of other studies [20,27,59,60] our results suggested that the heightto-diameter ratio of aspen and birch individuals significantly increases with increasing stand density. However, height-to-diameter ratio was also affected by the age of trees [61,62].…”
Section: Effects Of Stand Density and Tree Age On Allometric Relationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In accordance with the findings of other studies [20,27,59,60] our results suggested that the heightto-diameter ratio of aspen and birch individuals significantly increases with increasing stand density. However, height-to-diameter ratio was also affected by the age of trees [61,62].…”
Section: Effects Of Stand Density and Tree Age On Allometric Relationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the potential for this is much less in shrublands because size differences between individual stems are much less pronounced. Further, recent evidence suggests that more sophisticated allometric approaches than the one we used could considerably reduce uncertainty in C storage estimates [15]. Thus, overall it seems we can be fairly confident that our analyses have captured the majority of the true uncertainty in C storage estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This may have serious consequences for plot-level C storage estimates in forests, since the largest individuals within a plot usually contribute the vast majority of aboveground carbon [22]. There is some evidence this may also be true for shrublands [15], but for now there is too little evidence to be sure.…”
Section: Potential Sources Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, equations that use total height (TH) and DBH as independent variables are generally more widely applicable than equations with only DBH, as these may capture better the variation in the DBH/TH ratio due to ecological conditions. Návar et al (2013) found that other more complex variables such as tree slenderness (DBH/TH), tree cylindrical (VOL/ (DBH 2 TH)) or a compound form factor (DBH/TH*VOL/ (DBH 2 TH)) explain much more above-ground variability than H alone, and avoid multicollinearity problems. Furthermore, height is often difficult to measure, particularly in dense tropical forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%