2006
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional heterogeneity and gene flow maintain variance in a quantitative trait within populations of lodgepole pine

Abstract: Genetic variation is of fundamental importance to biological evolution, yet we still know very little about how it is maintained in nature. Because many species inhabit heterogeneous environments and have pronounced local adaptations, gene flow between differently adapted populations may be a persistent source of genetic variation within populations. If this migration-selection balance is biologically important then there should be strong correlations between genetic variance within populations and the amount … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
97
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic differentiation and diversity of the potentially adaptive SNPs reflect the environmental variability of these areas ( Figure 3C), which supports the view that there should be a correlation between the within-population genetic variation at adaptive traits and the environmental heterogeneity at the regional scale (Yeaman and Jarvis 2006;. However, it must be noted that most of the statistical approaches currently used to identify loci related to local adaptation (including those employed herein) assume that their alleles exhibit antagonistic pleiotropy (e.g., De Mita et al 2013; see review in Tiffin and Ross-Ibarra 2014), that is, that their variants are beneficial in particular regions of the species range and deleterious elsewhere.…”
Section: Geographic Extent Of Snp-climate Associations and Modes Of Asupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The genetic differentiation and diversity of the potentially adaptive SNPs reflect the environmental variability of these areas ( Figure 3C), which supports the view that there should be a correlation between the within-population genetic variation at adaptive traits and the environmental heterogeneity at the regional scale (Yeaman and Jarvis 2006;. However, it must be noted that most of the statistical approaches currently used to identify loci related to local adaptation (including those employed herein) assume that their alleles exhibit antagonistic pleiotropy (e.g., De Mita et al 2013; see review in Tiffin and Ross-Ibarra 2014), that is, that their variants are beneficial in particular regions of the species range and deleterious elsewhere.…”
Section: Geographic Extent Of Snp-climate Associations and Modes Of Asupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Finally, the higher vegetative success of invasive genotypes in North American natural conditions and the high phenotypic differentiation occurring between adjacent populations suggest that North Amer- ican populations of reed canarygrass currently experience selection pressures. The fact that spatially variable selection pressures are coupled with high gene flow (as indicated by low F st ) has likely maintained high genetic variance and high evolutionary potential within invasive populations (31). Thus, the most likely scenario is multiple introductions and extensive recombination of reed canarygrass' European strains promoting the rapid evolution of invasive ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that forest trees, with their clear-cut life stages and long life cycle, are rather well-suited for such an approach. The studies cited above prove that genetic diversity at the allelic, genotypic, multilocus or trait level is associated to environmental heterogeneity (Yeaman and Jarvis 2006). Detailed knowledge on how the environment varies in space and time is often lacking at fine spatial scales, and we may miss major relationships between genetic and environmental heterogeneity just because we have characterised the former but not the latter.…”
Section: How Much Selection?mentioning
confidence: 99%