2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional patterns in the geochemistry of oil-field water, southern San Joaquin Valley, California, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The injection and long production history have resulted in temporal variations in the total amount of hydrocarbons and produced waters being produced in the Fruitvale oil field (McMahon et al, ). The average reservoir temperature is 51 0 C and salinity is 0.095 M (Division of Oil Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), ).…”
Section: Produced Water Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The injection and long production history have resulted in temporal variations in the total amount of hydrocarbons and produced waters being produced in the Fruitvale oil field (McMahon et al, ). The average reservoir temperature is 51 0 C and salinity is 0.095 M (Division of Oil Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), ).…”
Section: Produced Water Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average reservoir temperature is 51 0 C and salinity is 0.095 M (Division of Oil Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), ). The relatively low salinity of the field compared to many oil‐field waters is a result of the significant recharge over geologic timescales from the Kern River and other smaller streams draining the high altitude Sierra Nevada (McMahon et al, ). There has been no significant change in reservoir salinity since injection began (Stephens et al, ).…”
Section: Produced Water Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For management and protection, deep groundwater should be characterized and continually monitored in California and elsewhere. Following concerns with aquifer exemptions, produced water injections, and renewed attention to protect groundwater from oil and gas development across the United States and internationally (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47), there is a move toward increasing the TDS threshold for groundwater protection from 3,000 mg/L to 10,000 mg/L (38,48). Because this move has just begun, studies of the depth to which groundwaters have TDS < 10,000 mg/L are limited to a few localized studies (38), and previous regional characterizations (20) remain at too coarse of a scale to be useful for regulators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because this move has just begun, studies of the depth to which groundwaters have TDS < 10,000 mg/L are limited to a few localized studies (38), and previous regional characterizations (20) remain at too coarse of a scale to be useful for regulators. Characterization is possible using a combination of historic groundwater quality data (20,21,38), new groundwater monitoring (7,46), and oil and gas data, including geophysical logs and production activities (such as injections for enhanced recovery and wastewater disposal) (38). There are challenges to relying solely on oil and gas data, particularly because they are limited to oil-and-gas-producing regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside of the oil field administrative boundaries (Figure 1b), hydrocarbons are not known to occur within the upper 300 m (Gillespie, Davis, Ball, et al, 2019). The median TDS of produced water from the Lost Hills and Belridge fields is about 30,000 and 20,000 mg/L, respectively (McMahon et al, 2018).…”
Section: Description Of Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%