2003
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-3-647-2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regional-scale GIS-models for assessment of hazards from glacier lake outbursts: evaluation and application in the Swiss Alps

Abstract: Abstract. Debris flows triggered by glacier lake outbursts have repeatedly caused disasters in various high-mountain regions of the world. Accelerated change of glacial and periglacial environments due to atmospheric warming and increased anthropogenic development in most of these areas raise the need for an adequate hazard assessment and corresponding modelling. The purpose of this paper is to provide a modelling approach which takes into account the current evolution of the glacial environment and satisfies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
143
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we use the modified single-flow model (MSF)-a simple GIS-based hydrological flow routing algorithm that calculates the flow direction from one DEM pixel to another according to the steepest downward gradient between each pixel and its eight neighbours (after O'Callaghan 1984), modified to allow flow spreading of up to 45°from the main flow direction (see Huggel et al 2003 for a full description). The maximum downstream travel distance for each GLOF path is determined using an empirically derived worst-case scenario defined by the overall trajectory slope to the source lake, with values as low as 5 % (3°a ngle of reach) considered appropriate for highly mobile sediment-laden events (Huggel et al 2004).…”
Section: Hazard Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we use the modified single-flow model (MSF)-a simple GIS-based hydrological flow routing algorithm that calculates the flow direction from one DEM pixel to another according to the steepest downward gradient between each pixel and its eight neighbours (after O'Callaghan 1984), modified to allow flow spreading of up to 45°from the main flow direction (see Huggel et al 2003 for a full description). The maximum downstream travel distance for each GLOF path is determined using an empirically derived worst-case scenario defined by the overall trajectory slope to the source lake, with values as low as 5 % (3°a ngle of reach) considered appropriate for highly mobile sediment-laden events (Huggel et al 2004).…”
Section: Hazard Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified single-flow direction (MSF) model applied here was developed by Huggel et al (2003) for debris flow-type mass movements in high-mountain environments. The debris flow is considered as a downslope moving mass largely controlled by gravitational force and following a given topography.…”
Section: Modified Single-flow Direction Model (Msf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To gain a more comprehensive perspective, two GIS-based lahar models are applied: the widely used LAHARZ developed by Iverson et al (1998) and a debris-flow model presented by Huggel et al (2003). To this end, a volcano with comprehensive and recent lahar studies and modeling was selected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the modified single-flowdirection (MSF) model by Huggel et al (2003), which is further developed from the D8 flow direction method (Marks et al, 1984). Model input parameters are the starting cell location, a DTM and an empirical value for the H/L ratio (see below).…”
Section: Lahar Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow direction is calculated from each cell to one of its eight neighbours (D8), either adjacent or diagonal, in the direction of the steepest descent. In order to prevent stream width being represented by only one pixel, Huggel et al (2003) implemented a function that enables flow diversion from the steepest flow direction. The more the flow diverts from the steepest descent direction, the higher the corresponding flow resistance.…”
Section: Lahar Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%