2011
DOI: 10.1142/s021989161100238x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularity of Weakly Well Posed Hyperbolic Mixed Problems With Characteristic Boundary

Abstract: Abstract. We study the mixed initial-boundary value problem for a linear hyperbolic system with characteristic boundary of constant multiplicity. We assume the problem to be "weakly" well posed, in the sense that a unique L 2 -solution exists, for sufficiently smooth data, and obeys an a priori energy estimate with a finite loss of conormal regularity. This is the case of problems that do not satisfy the uniform Kreiss-Lopatinskiȋ condition in the hyperbolic region of the frequency domain. Under the assumption… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us now state our main result: 5 (Ω − ), and ϕ 0 ∈ H m+10 (Γ). Moreover, the initial data satisfy (8), (22), (129) and (130) and are compatible up to order m + 9 in the sense of Definition 20. Then there exists…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let us now state our main result: 5 (Ω − ), and ϕ 0 ∈ H m+10 (Γ). Moreover, the initial data satisfy (8), (22), (129) and (130) and are compatible up to order m + 9 in the sense of Definition 20. Then there exists…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δ 0 is a fixed constant. Since the basic state in [35] was also assumed to satisfy (21) and the third boundary condition in (18), one can show that the stability condition (22) is equivalently rewritten as…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since U nc n+1 has already been determined, we can apply the well-posedness result of [Cou05], supplemented with the regularity result in [MS11], and construct a solution U n+1 ∈ C ∞ ((−∞, T ]; H +∞ (R d + )) to the above equations (in the interior and on the boundary).…”
Section: Construction Of Correctorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy of the proof. We closely follow the techniques developed in [21] (see also [20]). In principle, for given smooth functions u, ψ under the assumptions of Theorem 1, we consider the problem analogous to (1) solved by the functions λ −1,γ (Z)u and λ −1,γ (D )ψ; 5 this problem is obtained by acting on the original BVP solved by (u, ψ) by the operators λ −1,γ (Z), λ −1,γ (D ) and making use of the rules of the symbolic calculus collected in Section 3.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%