2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Regularization-based multi-frame super-resolution: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7) ). Using data-driven regularization that depends on image content can have benefits, such as edge-preservation ( Khattab et al, 2020 ). Forth, the multi-stack rotation SRR model suffers from signal over- and undershoot problems at contrast-rich regions due to regularization, as more thoroughly described by ( Shilling et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) ). Using data-driven regularization that depends on image content can have benefits, such as edge-preservation ( Khattab et al, 2020 ). Forth, the multi-stack rotation SRR model suffers from signal over- and undershoot problems at contrast-rich regions due to regularization, as more thoroughly described by ( Shilling et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we used the identity matrix as regularization matrix. Using image-dependent regularization can have benefits, such as edge-preservation [51]. In addition, our analysis does not include motion and eddy current correction in the SRR model, while perfect registration in SRR is of importance to obtain non-blurry high-resolution results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ere are some degrading influences in the practical sampling process including atmospheric instability, the motion of objects, blur effect, and downsampling equipment [12]. Consequently, the choice of a suitable degradation model is the primary key to reconstruct the SR image as shown in Figure 1 which is the core kernel of the image reconstruction process [31].…”
Section: Image Observation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform the processes of quantitative analysis, evaluation, and comparison for the reconstruction performance, we generate synthetic data and calculate the peak-signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) indicator and the structural similarity (SSIM) indicator of our estimated HR image with regard to a ground-truth image [8,26,31,38,39]. erefore, the PSNR measurement is calculated from the mean square error (MSE), where the MSE reflects the average error among the reconstructed SR image and the original HR image.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%