Regulatory foci and expatriate adjustment

Lee, Chun-Han; Hung, Chao-Chih; Chien, Chi-Sheng; Zhuang, Wen-Long; Hsu, Carol Ying-Yu

doi:10.1108/pr-03-2015-0077

Cited by 17 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the reliability analysis, Cronbach's α was selected in this article (Lee et al, 2017). The results showed that Cronbach's α values of all dimensions were greater than .7 (see Table 3), indicating good data consistency, which could be further analyzed.…”

Section: Reliability and Validity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Mechanism of Word-of-Mouth for Tourist Destinations in Crisis

Niu

et al. 2020

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In an era of mobile internet, word-of-mouth marketing has become a powerful tool for optimizing tourist destination marketing. Extensive research studies on the mechanism of word-of-mouth have been carried out. However, there is little research on the mechanism of word-of-mouth concerning tourist destinations in crisis. This article focuses on the influence mechanism of word-of-mouth in the relationship between perceived images and behavioral intentions. A structural equation model was established, with “perceived image” as the independent variable, “word-of-mouth” and “psychological distance” as mediating variables, and “behavioral intention” as the dependent variable. Our study is based on a survey in Southern Xinjiang. The final results show that word-of-mouth plays a mediating role in the relationship between perceived image and behavioral intentions. The moderating effect of word-of-mouth plays two roles in the mechanism of the perceived image on the behavioral intention: the promotion mechanism and the repression mechanism. Tourists’ sense of psychological distance significantly mediates the relationship between perceived image and behavioral intention. The findings enrich word-of-mouth and the marketing theories for the destinations in crisis, which provide enlightening insights for the sustainable development of the destinations in crisis.

show abstract

Section: Reliability and Validity Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Mechanism of Word-of-Mouth for Tourist Destinations in Crisis

Niu

et al. 2020

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In determining the reliability of study instruments, Cronbach Alpha was adopted as parameter for measurement. A suitable and conventional reliability coefficient of any study must be equal to or greater than 0.70 (Lee et al, 2017). In the present study the reliability coefficient for sexual desire, sexual satisfaction and pain during virginal penetration are .94, .86, .91 respectively.…”

Section: Source: Field Work 2019mentioning

confidence: 69%

The Influence of Genital Mutilation on Women’s Sexual Activities in Oke-Ona, Community, Abeokuta, Nigeria

Omonijo

Anyaegbunam

Chukwuemeka

et al. 2019

Journal of Educational and Social Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was conducted to examine the influence of female genital mutilation on women sexual activities in Oke-Ona community, Abeokuta North Local Government Area of Ogun-State, South-West Geopolitical Zone of Nigeria with respect to: sexual satisfaction, sexual desire and virginal penetration experience. In order to achieve its aim, the study raised three hypotheses, each on sexual satisfaction, sexual desire and virginal penetration experience. These hypotheses were tested through t-test statistical method via the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 23rd version. Results showed no positive interaction between genital mutilation and sexual satisfaction [t (109) = .560, P>.05]. It also revealed no significance in the mean difference frequency of sexual desire of genitally mutilated women compared to those not genitally mutilated [t (109) = - .640, P>.05]. Besides, the findings indicated no significant difference in the mean difference in the vaginal penetration experience between genitally mutilated women and those not genitally mutilated [t (109) = −1.523, P>.05]. Furtherance to the conclusions drawn, the implications of the findings were discussed and recommendations were made.

show abstract

“…Regulatory foci were measured by a 12-item scale adopted from Wallace and Chen (2006), and which was supported by previous employees' studies of Hung, Huan, Lee, Lin, and Zhuang (2018) and Lee, Hung, Chien, Zhuang, and Hsu (2017). There are six items of promotion focus and six items of prevention focus.…”

Section: Regulatory Focimentioning

confidence: 99%