2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01097.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reimbursement for smoking cessation treatment may double the abstinence rate: results of a randomized trial

Abstract: Reimbursement for SCT seems efficacious in increasing the use of SCT and may double the number of successful quitters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
68
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Au et al 25 showed within a cohort study of 23,971 current and past smokers that smoking cessation was associated with a reduced risk of exacerbations. Reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation therapy has been shown to be both efficacious 26 and cost-effective. 27 Exacerbations are important determinants of prognosis in patients with COPD, and are associated with economic costs, 28 health status, 29,30 lung function, 31 and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Au et al 25 showed within a cohort study of 23,971 current and past smokers that smoking cessation was associated with a reduced risk of exacerbations. Reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation therapy has been shown to be both efficacious 26 and cost-effective. 27 Exacerbations are important determinants of prognosis in patients with COPD, and are associated with economic costs, 28 health status, 29,30 lung function, 31 and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to start smoking cessation as early as possible as patients with COPD stop smoking less easily than smokers without COPD. Reimbursement of smoking cessation treatment clearly increases smoking cessation rates [62].…”
Section: Smoking Cessation In Copdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is problematic if it is not correct, as it could potentially bias results and statistical tests in favour of an effective treatment if attrition rates are higher in the control group. Also, there is some evidence to suggest that those lost to follow-up may not necessarily be smoking [25][26][27][28][29] .…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%