Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Sengketa Perdata Berbasis Nilai Keadilan

Dewanto, Pandu

doi:10.26623/jic.v5i2.2307

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, these paradigms strongly influence a judge's decisions. Judges are tasked with resolving conflicts governed by legislation (Dewanto, Hakim, and Perdata 2020). They exercise judicial authority to ensure the proper functioning of the judiciary.…”

Section: The Construction Of Constructivism Paradigmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of The “Coffee Cyanide” Case: Unveiling Judicial Decisions From A Constructivist Paradigm Perspective

Febriyani,

Tantimin,

Alhakim

et al. 2024

JMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The judicial verdict fundamentally embodies the effort of legal enforcement to actualize the ideals of justice, certainty, and utility. It stands as the culmination of the paradigm believed by the judiciary. This study scrutinizes the judicial considerations within the constructivist paradigm, focusing on the case of cyanide coffee. Conducted qualitatively, this research delves into conceptual ideas examining the guidelines for legal discovery by judges in cases of premeditated murder involving cyanide coffee, employing a paradigmatic analysis through the lens of legal philosophy. The findings reveal that judicial decisions in cyanide coffee cases within the constructivist paradigm have yet to fully reflect a sense of justice. Therefore, legal efforts are imperative to instill a sense of fairness within society.

show abstract

Section: The Construction Of Constructivism Paradigmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of The “Coffee Cyanide” Case: Unveiling Judicial Decisions From A Constructivist Paradigm Perspective

Febriyani,

Tantimin,

Alhakim

et al. 2024

JMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tentunya, putusan hakim ini sangat diharapkan oleh pihak yang berperkara untuk dapat menjunjung tinggi nilai-nilai keadilan dan tidak merugikan. Oleh karena itu, peran nalar hakim sangatlah berpengaruh (Dewanto, 2020).…”

Section: Interpretasi Hakim Yang Beragam Menimbulkan Kerancuan Pada M...unclassified

Rekonstruksi Konsep Tamkin Sempurna dalam Pasal 80 Ayat (5) KHI Perspektif Maqasid Abdullah bin Bayyah

Fashihuddin,

Sj,

Izzuddin

2023

almanhaj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Compilation of Islamic Law is the material basis for the Panel of Judges in deciding cases in the Religious Courts. However, the substantive content of KHI still needs to be reviewed. One of them is the problem of perfect tamkin as the cause of the husband's obligation to support his wife in Article 80 paragraph (5) KHI. The meaning contained in this phrase is classified as abstract, thus giving birth to various interpretations of judges, even though in essence the cases handled tend to be the same. Therefore, this study aims to determine substantive weaknesses and reconstruct the meaning of perfect tamkin and review it from Abdullah bin Bayyah's maqasid perspective. The method used is normative qualitative method using KHI as the primary legal material. Methods of data collection using the method of documentation. This research resulted in: (1) in article 80 paragraph (5) KHI found substantive weaknesses that must be addressed, namely: a) incomplete adoption of fiqh opinions; b) the substance of the article which leads to the applicability of meaning in general; and c) the judges' interpretations vary which causes confusion in the meaning of nature. (2) in reconstructing the article, elaboration is needed between the interpretation of the fuqaha and the judge. In order to find a formula regarding the definition of perfect tamkin, its indicators, and the conditions for a wife to earn a living. In the maqasid review, it was found that the method used to determine tamkin is sukut al-syari' and it belongs to al-wasilah ila al-maqsad al-tabi'i

show abstract

“…Oleh karena hakim harus dapat mempertimbangkan segala aspek baik dari sisi penggugat maupun tergugat sehingga ketika hakim menjatuhkan putusan, dari pihak yang dikalahkan tidak menjadi semakin menjadi kalah dan putusan tersebut pihak yang kalah tidak dihukum terlalu tinggi dan tidak memberatkan. 26 Putusan yang dijatuhkan oleh hakim harus berdasarkan pertimbangan yang jelas dan cukup. Pertimbangan hakim adalah alasan-alasan penjatuhan hukum yang dilakukan oleh hakim yang dinyatakan dalam putusan hakim.…”

Section: Reposisi Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdataunclassified

Reposisi Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Dengan Gugatan Sederhana (Small Claim Court)

Prasetyo

Supriyadi

Sulistyani

et al. 2022

JULR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa reposisi pelaksanaan penyelesaian sengketa perdata dengan gugatan sederhana (small claim court). Hal ini yang menjadi urgensi penulis memfokuskan untuk memberikan rekomendasi kepada pengadilan sebagai evaluasi agar melaksanakan sesuai dengan Perma No.4 tahun 2019. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan Yuridis Normatif. Kebaharuan penelitian ini terletak pada penyimpangan ketentuan dalam Perma No. 4 tahun 2019 yang tidak dijalankan Pengadilan sehingga perlu dilakukan reposisi untuk menata kembali. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan pelaksanaan penyelesaian sengketa perdata dengan gugatan sederhana (small claim court) meliputi tahapan pendaftaran, pemeriksaan kelengkapan gugatan sederhana, penetapan hakim dan penunjukkan panitera pengganti, pemeriksaan pendahuluan, penetapan hari sidang dan pemanggilan para pihak, pemeriksaan sidang dan perdamaian, pembuktian dan putusan diselesaikan dalam waktu paling lama 25 (dua puluh lima) hari sejak sidang pertama. Apabila ada yang keberatan dengan putusan tersebut dapat mengajukan memori keberatan diselesaikan dalam waktu 7 (tujuh) hari. The purpose of this study is to understand the repositioning of Civil Dispute Settlement Implementation with a Simple Claim (Small Claim Court). This is the urgency of the author to focus on providing recommendations to the court as an evaluation in order to carry out in accordance with Perma No. 4 of 2019. This research method uses normative juridical. The novelty of this research lies in the deviation of the provisions in Perma No. 4 of 2019 which was not carried out by the Court so it needed to be repositioned to reorganize. Based on the results of the study, it shows that the Implementation of Civil Dispute Settlement With a Simple Claim (Small Claim Court) includes the registration stage, examination of the completeness of a simple lawsuit, determination of the judge and appointment of a substitute clerk, preliminary examination, determination of the day of trial and summons of the parties, examination of the trial and reconciliation, evidence and decision completed within a maximum of 25 (twenty-five) days. since the first trial. If there are objections to the decision, they can file a memorandum of objection to be resolved within 7 (seven) days.

show abstract

Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Sengketa Perdata Berbasis Nilai Keadilan

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Analysis of The “Coffee Cyanide” Case: Unveiling Judicial Decisions From A Constructivist Paradigm Perspective

Analysis of The “Coffee Cyanide” Case: Unveiling Judicial Decisions From A Constructivist Paradigm Perspective

Rekonstruksi Konsep Tamkin Sempurna dalam Pasal 80 Ayat (5) KHI Perspektif Maqasid Abdullah bin Bayyah

Reposisi Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Dengan Gugatan Sederhana (Small Claim Court)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About