2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
37
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…When a metacognition trait is placed concurrently with Gf, it extracts considerably the intelligence's variance, decreasing the strength of the Gf-General Academic Achievement and Gf-Specific Academic Achievement relationship. So, this paper holds the assumption that metacognition is as important as, or more important than intelligence to explain academic achievement, in accordance with the metacognitive literature regarding academic achievement and learning outcomes (Van der Stel & Veenman, 2008;Veenman & Verheij, 2003;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When a metacognition trait is placed concurrently with Gf, it extracts considerably the intelligence's variance, decreasing the strength of the Gf-General Academic Achievement and Gf-Specific Academic Achievement relationship. So, this paper holds the assumption that metacognition is as important as, or more important than intelligence to explain academic achievement, in accordance with the metacognitive literature regarding academic achievement and learning outcomes (Van der Stel & Veenman, 2008;Veenman & Verheij, 2003;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Secondly, the findings of this work point to a direction neither supporting that metacognition is strictly domain-general (Schraw & Neitfeld, 1998;Van der Stel & Veenman, 2008;Veenman & Verhiej, 2003;Veenman et al, 1997), nor considering it as strictly domain specific (Desoete & Roeyers, 2002;Glaser et al, 1992;Kelemen et al, 2000). Theresults suggest that metacognition can be eitherdomain-general ordomain-specific, or both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Knowledge about potentially useful strategies, personal weaknesses, and interactions between task demands and strategies, directly influence strategy use hence indirectly affecting learning outcomes (Schneider et al, 1998;Van der Stel & Veenman, 2008;Veenman & Spaans, 2005). Precise procedural metacognitive skills, such as accurate monitoring of correct and incorrect answers, precede an efficient and successful search for committed errors (Roebers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%