1984
DOI: 10.1051/parasite/1984591041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations hôtes-parasites du trématode Microphallus papillorobustus (Rankin, 1940)

Abstract: RÉSUMÉ. Les réponses à certains stimulus de Host-parasite interfaces of the Trematode Microphallus papillorobustus (Rankin, 1940). III. Factors involved in the behavioural alterations of the Gammarus intermediate hosts and predator tests.SUMMARY. The responses of infected and uninfected Gammarus to certain stimuli are experi mentally studied. Under the influence of the cerebral metacercaria of Microphallus papillorobustus, the light preferendum of the Gammarids is shifted towards an area of higher illumination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes, such parasite-modified behaviour changes the spatial distribution of the host population (e.g. Helluy 1984;Curtis 1987;Thomas et al 1998;Kuris 2005). Altering the spatial distribution of hosts can affect intra and interspecific interactions of the host population (Thomas et al 1998;Ponton et al 2005), and potentially affect the surrounding community (Thomas et al 1998(Thomas et al , 1999Mouritsen & Poulin 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, such parasite-modified behaviour changes the spatial distribution of the host population (e.g. Helluy 1984;Curtis 1987;Thomas et al 1998;Kuris 2005). Altering the spatial distribution of hosts can affect intra and interspecific interactions of the host population (Thomas et al 1998;Ponton et al 2005), and potentially affect the surrounding community (Thomas et al 1998(Thomas et al , 1999Mouritsen & Poulin 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In G. insensibilis, the parasite induces behavioural changes such that the infected amphipod becomes photophilic, prefers to swim closer to the water surface, and becomes hyperactive when confronted with an avian predator (Helluy, 1983;Helluy & Thomas 2003). These behavioural changes have been found to increase susceptibility of G. insensibilis to predation by bird definitive hosts (Helluy, 1984). However, in the case of G. aequicauda, behavioural changes only occur if the amphipod is infected during its juvenile stage (Helluy, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Helluy, 1983;Kunz & Pung, 2004), we expected M. novaezealandensis to be capable of manipulating the behaviour of its other second intermediate hosts, such as the amphipod P. novizealandiae. Predation of amphipods by avian definitive hosts occurs at low tide in shallow water puddles; amphipod activity and vertical distribution are not only traits likely to determine predation rates, they are also targets of manipulation in other microphallid-crustacean systems (Helluy, 1983(Helluy, , 1984Kunz & Pung, 2004). These are therefore the behavioural traits investigated here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the parasitic worms Euhaplorchis californiensis and Microphallus papillorobustus infect and alter the behavior of killifish and gammarids, respectively, causing changes in behavior that increase the probability of consumption by terminal hosts (Table 1). These latter changes in behavior are hypothesized to be triggered by changes in monoamine signaling in the host [19,20,[95][96][97][98][99][100].…”
Section: Parasitoids and Parasites-neuromodulation Molecular Mimicry And Neuroinflammationmentioning
confidence: 99%