2012
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2012.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between age and prostate size

Abstract: In a community-based study, the relationship between age and human prostate size was investigated in a population of men between the ages of 40 and 70 years to determine the normal prostate increase curve equation. One thousand male volunteers were randomly recruited from the Shanghai community, and the length, width, height, volume of the transition zone (TZ) and the whole prostates were measured by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Each volunteer was evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
58
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, reducing the 2D template image size used for registration to a 356 × 292 pixels AOI (64.08 × 52.56 mm 2 ) showed a decrease in TRE. This AOI is larger than an average healthy prostate length and height of approximately 40 × 30 mm 2 with a volume of 30 cm 3 ; however, many prostate glands with cancer are often enlarged and can fill this region with anatomical information. Since there is some variability when manually selecting fiducials, the chosen AOI would be influenced by an unknown bias in the TRE measurement given that the TRE was used for AOI selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Interestingly, reducing the 2D template image size used for registration to a 356 × 292 pixels AOI (64.08 × 52.56 mm 2 ) showed a decrease in TRE. This AOI is larger than an average healthy prostate length and height of approximately 40 × 30 mm 2 with a volume of 30 cm 3 ; however, many prostate glands with cancer are often enlarged and can fill this region with anatomical information. Since there is some variability when manually selecting fiducials, the chosen AOI would be influenced by an unknown bias in the TRE measurement given that the TRE was used for AOI selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The inferior–superior direction is indicated by letter Z. In the X‐Y plane, the resolutions of the fiducial marker center locations were generated according to the resolution of grid template, which is 5 mm, while interval along the Z direction was determined by the size of the fiducial markers and the average‐sized prostate 12, 13. Total of 40 different fiducial marker implant patterns for four fiducial marker combinations were studied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVs were compared to expected age-adjusted volumes of healthy men using the nomogram of Zackrisson et al 9 The values provided in this nomogram are similar to values presented in other available nomograms. [10][11][12] In patients who were older than 30 years during SCI, measured PVs were also compared to PVs adjusted to the age of injury. Continuous variables were compared using the ttest and categorical variables using Fischer's exact test and the chi square tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%