Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat.No.CH37144)
DOI: 10.1109/mwscas.2000.951586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between amplifier settling time and pole-zero placements for second-order systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presence of pole zero doublets in the frequency response results in a long settling tail in time response, and hence poor settling performance [10], [11], [12]. In this design minimal transistor sizing and choice of optimal tail current [13] results in pushing the pole zero doublet pair far beyond the unity gain bandwidth frequency of the amplifier as is evident from Fig.5 …”
Section: B Frequency Domain Pole Zero and Bandwidth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of pole zero doublets in the frequency response results in a long settling tail in time response, and hence poor settling performance [10], [11], [12]. In this design minimal transistor sizing and choice of optimal tail current [13] results in pushing the pole zero doublet pair far beyond the unity gain bandwidth frequency of the amplifier as is evident from Fig.5 …”
Section: B Frequency Domain Pole Zero and Bandwidth Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of will be shown for the class-A and class-AB circuits, respectively, in the following paragraph. During the hold phase is added to the differential input voltage, , leading to (20) and (21) Low order harmonic distortion components can be found for the class-A circuit to be equal to HD (22) HD (23) and HD (24) where represent the amplitude of the sinusoidal input current . For the case of the class-AB CSH circuit, it can be found that HD (25) and…”
Section: ) Static Offset Voltagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an error of 2%, . The settling time of can be derived from the following relation: (26) Substituting (12) and (18) into the left side of this relation, we have (27) The settling time for function can be determined from this equation and is given by (28) From this last relation, it is possible to calculate the exponential variation rate of the functions , , and . Using (25) and (28), the exponential variation rate can be written as (29) If and are known, may be readily determined.…”
Section: E Functions Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%