Relationship between Angular Measurements and Facial Shape of Young Ivorians with Normal Dental Occlusion

Diomande, Moussa; Beugré, Jean-Bertin; Koueita, Mariam Konaté Kady; Vaysse, Frédéric

doi:10.1155/2018/6395910

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Protrusion or retrusion of midfacial (nasal) segment influences the facial aesthetics and can be objectively determined by measuring the facial angles of this segment. Protrusion of this segment is racially characterististic for Africans, retrusion for Asians [6,11,17]. In Caucasians, retrusion of nasal third is rarely connected to normal racial antropological variations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The influence of antero-posterior dentoskeletal pattern on the value of nasal soft tissue angles: a cephalometric study

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of sagittal dentoskeletal pattern on the value of profile nasal soft tissue angles and estimate the significance of examined differences for each angle. Lateral cephalograms were used to examine the nasofrontal angle, nasofacial angle, nasal tip angle, and nasolabial angle of 120 adult Caucasian subjects (60 male and 60 female) from the central Balkan area. Subjects were divided into four groups according to the ANB angle and incisors inclination: Class I as the control group, Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class III. By evaluating the influence of sagittal dentoskeletal relationships on the values of examined angles, significant differences were found among subjects with Class I and Class II/2 (p=0.028), so as Class III (p=0.002) for nasal tip angle. The nasofacial angle was found to differ among subjects with Class I and Class II/1 (p=0.002), so as Class III (p=0.001). Different dentoskeletal patterns have significant influence on values of the nasal tip angle and nasofacial angle, and don't have influence on the values of the nasofrontal and nasolabial angle.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The nasofacial angle indicates its prominence in relation to the entire facial massif [6]. The average values for eugnathic subjects range, according to various authors, from 30˚ to 40.5˚ [3,8,20].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The influence of antero-posterior dentoskeletal pattern on the value of nasal soft tissue angles: a cephalometric study

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Profile harmony, unlike aesthetics, is defined by numerous parameters (among them the angle ones are predominant), making it clearly defined and measurable. Angle thought that universal measurement for assessing different facial profiles harmony [3] cannot be applied, because the profile morphotype is affected by various factors such as: ethnic and geographical [4], gender [5], ecological, biological, age and nutritional factors [6].…”

Section: Introduction mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Influence of the Sagittal Dentoskeletal Pattern on the Value of the Soft Tissue Profile Angles - a Cephalometric Study

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study has been to establish the values of soft tissue profile angles in subjects with dentoskeletal Class I, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III pattern, in order to examine the influence of sagittal dentoskeletal relation on the value of angular profile parameters. This comparative cephalometric study included the examination and the analysis by lateral cephalograms to evaluate soft tissue profile angles for 120 adult Caucasian subjects (60 women and 60 men) from the mid Balkan region divided into four groups towards ANB angle and incisors inclination. The following angles were examined: angle of facial convexity, facial convexity angle for the lower face and the angle of total facial convexity. By investigating the influence of the sagittal dentoskeletal pattern on the value of facial convexity angles, significant differences have been established between subjects with Class I and Class II Division 1 and 2 for all examined angles (p<0.001; p=0.011), while the differences between Class I and Class III are only significant for the facial convexity angle and facial convexity angle for the lower face, while the differences in the overall facial convexity angle are not significant (p=0.067). There are significant differences between subjects for all examined angles except the total facial convexity angle between Class I and Class III.

show abstract

Face Proportions, and Analysis of Maxillary Anterior Teeth and Facial Proportions in a Thai Population

Wadud¹,

Kitisubkanchana²,

Santiwong³

et al. 2021

TODENTJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Esthetics is the primary consideration for patients looking for prosthetic treatment. Determining the facial types of Thai populations is important because most studies conducted in Caucasian populations mention their facial types, and describe the gender comparisons, and GP of the teeth. Objectives: This study compared facial proportions, analyzed the maxillary anterior teeth proportions and determined the relationships between teeth with facial measurements using the Golden Proportion (GP) and Golden Standard (GS) in a Thai population. Methods: A total of 200 students (18-35 years) with well-aligned maxillary anterior teeth participated in this study. Face heights and widths were measured from the face using digital calipers and faces were classified as narrow, average, and broad. Teeth and face proportions were compared with GP and GS. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare maxillary anterior teeth proportions and facial proportions with different face types (α= 0.05). Pearson’s correlation was used (α= 0.05) to determine the correlation between facial proportion and teeth dimension among different facial types. Results: The findings showed 82.50% narrow face, 13.50% average, and 4% broad face among Thai subjects. No GP or GS was found in the face and anterior teeth, but teeth and face proportions other than GP and GS were found. No significant correlation was found between the Width of the Central Incisor (WCI) with interpupillary distance and alar width. Conclusion: In this study, the GP was not found in the facial and teeth proportion. The data obtained from this study may help to provide guidelines for prosthetic and orthodontic management and help to select the proper size and form of the maxillary anterior teeth to achieve proper esthetic outcomes in the Thai population.

show abstract

Relationship between Angular Measurements and Facial Shape of Young Ivorians with Normal Dental Occlusion

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

The influence of antero-posterior dentoskeletal pattern on the value of nasal soft tissue angles: a cephalometric study

The influence of antero-posterior dentoskeletal pattern on the value of nasal soft tissue angles: a cephalometric study

The Influence of the Sagittal Dentoskeletal Pattern on the Value of the Soft Tissue Profile Angles - a Cephalometric Study

Face Proportions, and Analysis of Maxillary Anterior Teeth and Facial Proportions in a Thai Population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About