2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between solubility and solubility product: The roles of crystal sizes and crystallographic directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this explanation is entirely consistent with chemical thermodynamics [37,38] and the observations of increasing dissolution, it is necessary to acknowledge that the quantification of dissolved Ag can also be influenced by the size detection limits of the SP-ICP-MS, which are approximately 16 nm for Ag NPs (for our instrument, under the conditions applied here). Ag…”
Section: Nanoparticle Dissolutionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although this explanation is entirely consistent with chemical thermodynamics [37,38] and the observations of increasing dissolution, it is necessary to acknowledge that the quantification of dissolved Ag can also be influenced by the size detection limits of the SP-ICP-MS, which are approximately 16 nm for Ag NPs (for our instrument, under the conditions applied here). Ag…”
Section: Nanoparticle Dissolutionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Ruiz-Agudo et al (2009) suggested that Mg 2+ inhibits etch pit spreading by its preferential incorporation as MgCO 3°a t kink/step sites in the obtuse-obtuse corners, possibly through the surface reaction with >CaOH 2 + sites. Furthermore, it has been proposed that for impurities to have significant impacts on calcite growth and dissolution processes, their concentrations must exceed certain threshold values (Fan et al, 2006;Meyer, 1984). In the present study, the solution concentrations of trace divalent cations range from $10 À1 to $10 2 ppb, which are more than three orders of magnitude lower than the impurity concentrations investigated on calcite in the literature (Arvidson et al, 2006(Arvidson et al, , 2003Astilleros et al, 2000;Davis et al, 2000Davis et al, , 2004Fan et al, 2006;Freij et al, 2005;Gutjahr et al, 1996b;Lea et al, 2001;Reeder, 1996;Ruiz-Agudo et al, 2009;Teng et al, 1999;Vinson et al, 2007;Vinson and Luttge, 2005;Wasylenki et al, 2005a, b).…”
Section: Etch Pit Formation and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 49%
“…A second explanation for X e > 1.0 is the differences in the crystal solubility K b and the solubility product K sp (Fan et al, 2006). Theoretical analysis has suggested that the chemical potential and thus the solubility K b is dependent on crystal size and crystallographic direction.…”
Section: Step Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Growth beyond this value is energetically unfavorable, and the nucleated pit should remain stable as a hollow core (Lasaga and Blum, 1986). At the edges of a crystal preferential removal of atoms is caused by the higher surface energy at these sites and may lead to the development of crystal surfaces with different orientations (Fan et al, 2006;Snyder and Doherty, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%