DOI: 10.1159/000414253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship Maturity: A Conceptual and Empirical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory was supported in particular by the significant and positive relations between the achievement of interdependence as an adulthood indicator and all nine romantic relationship qualities. These significant relations also are consistent with a theory of relationship maturity (White et al 1986(White et al , 1987, which consists of three levels: self-focused, role-focused, and individuated-connected. This final level relates to the achieved criteria of interdependence as it involves the connection between people, and the social cognitive abilities (e.g., perspective-taking skills) that foster that connection.…”
Section: Achieved Adulthood Criteria and Relationship Qualitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This theory was supported in particular by the significant and positive relations between the achievement of interdependence as an adulthood indicator and all nine romantic relationship qualities. These significant relations also are consistent with a theory of relationship maturity (White et al 1986(White et al , 1987, which consists of three levels: self-focused, role-focused, and individuated-connected. This final level relates to the achieved criteria of interdependence as it involves the connection between people, and the social cognitive abilities (e.g., perspective-taking skills) that foster that connection.…”
Section: Achieved Adulthood Criteria and Relationship Qualitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Future researchers could further explore at what stage the development of the social network, particularly in new environments, becomes stable and more consistent. In general, our findings indicate that there is a significant buffering effect of positive friendship quality in shared activities and role-focused interests, this is in line with previous findings (Bagwell et al, 2005;Berndt, 2004;Brendgen et al, 1998;Degirmencioglu et al, 1998;Rubin et al, 2004;Way & Greene, 2006;White et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Notably, only the intimate style is indicative of a normal and effective friendship. White, Speisman, Costos, and Smith (1987) developed a 3-level theory in friendships, involving self-focused, role-focused, and individuated-connected components. These authors stated that only upon reaching the highest level of relationship maturity can one go a step higher in one's life.…”
Section: Literature Review Development and Functions Of Friendship Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychologists have found that friendships promote growth in social cognition and self-concept (Staub 1995), increase feelings of social belonging (Bishop and Inderbitzen 1995), increase self-esteem (Bishop 1995), promote a better understanding of other's needs, foster mutual trust (Neibrzydowski 1995), encourage greater consideration in regard to the society in which they live (Selman 1990, White et al 1987, and promote prosocial behavior (Hartup 1983). For people who like new experiences, friendships thus serve to expose a person to the socio-political world, perhaps activating a political ideology that psychologically satisfies an openness to change and new experience.…”
Section: Novelty-seeking Friends and Liberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%