2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000154718.80594.2e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of Static and Dynamic Mechanisms in Vestibuloocular Reflex Compensation

Abstract: Plasticity in dynamic vestibular reflexes induced by UCP is preserved after a subsequent UL. However, neurologic events during the first and second day after UL appear to limit, change, or suppress the long-term dynamic compensation of the VOR, regardless of whether the animal had a previous UCP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(122 reference statements)
4
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to labyrinthectomy, we found that postoperative disequilibrium in patients after semicircular canal plugging compensated quickly and completely [1]. This finding was consistent with previous studies in animals [2,3,4]. …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to labyrinthectomy, we found that postoperative disequilibrium in patients after semicircular canal plugging compensated quickly and completely [1]. This finding was consistent with previous studies in animals [2,3,4]. …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In gerbils, however, a clear difference in both the time course and degree of recovery was observed between UCP and UL. The UCP group compensated faster and more completely, particularly with rotation toward the lesion (ipsilateral side) [4]. This subtly different pattern of behavioral recovery following UCP and UL might indicate that different molecular mechanisms occurred during compensation in the vestibular nuclei.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be argued that since peripheral lesions decrease both the aVOR gain and time constant (Fetter and Zee 1988;Hain and Buettner 1990;Wade et al 1999), the reason that labyrinthine-defective subjects are less prone to motion sickness is that fewer impulses are generated by the partially damaged peripheral vestibular end organs. The fact that the high frequency gains return to normal levels in the labyrinthinedefective subjects is not uncommon after bilateral labyrinthine lesions (Baloh et al 1984;Black et al 2001;Galiana et al 2001;Palla and Straumann 2004;Newlands et al 2005) and may be accomplished either centrally or peripherally (Palla and Straumann 2004).…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms For Reduction Of Motion Sickness Susceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common feature of these lesions is a reduction in the high frequency aVOR gain and a reduction in the vestibular time constant (Wade et al 1999). The reduction in the aVOR gain tested at frequencies of 2-6 Hz, can recover to normal range over about 1 year, but the time constant and low frequency aVOR gain may never recover (Fetter and Zee 1988;Black et al 2001;Palla and Straumann 2004;Newlands et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%