2010
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2010.1575.1577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships Between Milk Somatic Cell Count and pH in Dairy Cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of present study showed highly significant (P<0.01) positive correlation (r = 0.793) between SCC and milk pH and pH tended to increase with increase in SCC. The mean pH value for healthy group was lesser (6.634±0.009) as compared to subclinical infected group (6.837±0.020), which is in agreement with the results of previous reports (Batavani et al, 2007;Hassan, 2013), whereas, negative relationship between SCC and milk pH has been reported by Atasever et al (2010). These changes might be linked to the increase permeability of the mammary epithelium cell lead to the transfer of components from blood to milk such as citrates and bicarbonates that cause elevated pH levels (Harmon, 1994).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The findings of present study showed highly significant (P<0.01) positive correlation (r = 0.793) between SCC and milk pH and pH tended to increase with increase in SCC. The mean pH value for healthy group was lesser (6.634±0.009) as compared to subclinical infected group (6.837±0.020), which is in agreement with the results of previous reports (Batavani et al, 2007;Hassan, 2013), whereas, negative relationship between SCC and milk pH has been reported by Atasever et al (2010). These changes might be linked to the increase permeability of the mammary epithelium cell lead to the transfer of components from blood to milk such as citrates and bicarbonates that cause elevated pH levels (Harmon, 1994).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Research in dairy cattle has showed that the pH of milk is not an effective predictor of MQT (Ikonen et al 2004; Atasever et al 2010). This is in accordance with our findings, where pH was not a significant predictor in most of the studied MQT with the exception of milk fat content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, some of the selected physicochemical traits which can be routinely used are milk electrical conductivity (MEC), refractive index (RI) and pH. Studies on cows’ milk have showed that MEC and RI are correlated with milk's fat, protein and total solids content (Jääskeläinen et al 2001; Mabrook & Petty, 2003; Chigerwe & Hagey, 2014), whereas pH has not been found to be significantly correlated with MQT (Atasever et al 2010). Similar studies regarding the correlation between physicochemical traits and MQT in sheep milk are missing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could easily be caused by environmental factors as previously mentioned. Many of the samples used for the study were shown to be outside the normal range of milk pH where external factors such as bacteria in the milk making the milk acidic or mastitis making the milk more alkaline might affect the tails of the distribution (Atasever et al 2010). We analyzed the tails of the trait within this experiment, and therefore, we might be analyzing the impact of the external factors instead of the intended trait.…”
Section: Identification Of Possible Candidate Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%