Relativistic Kinematics I: A Theory of Relativistic Kinematics Based on Physical Reality

Huang, Young-Sea

doi:10.4006/1.3028888

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…20 Major sources of errors are not only the incorrect rejection of Einstein's equivalence principle, but the acceptance of Einstein's invalid covariance principle. 21 In addition to 12 Their influence has altered MIT open course phys. 8.033 to include errors in general relativity again in 2006.…”

Section: The Conflict Between Einstein's Covariance Principle Andmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Thus, they made the combined errors of Pauli and the 1911 assumption. 12 To be specific, the phrase, "must take on" should be changed to "must take on approximately" Also, the phrase, "experiments confined to infinitesimally small regions of spacetime" does not make sense since experiments can be conducted only in a finite region. Moreover, in their Eq.…”

Section: Validity Of Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its MImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…13 He also claimed that Einstein's equivalence principle is not rigorously valid. In the paper of Huang, 12 coordinate system K 0 (X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , X 4 ) in which gravitation has no influence either in the motion of particles or any physical process." Thus, Pauli regards the equivalence principle as merely the existence of locally constant spaces, which may not be locally Minkowski.…”

Section: Validity Of Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its MImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9 Moreover, many simply cannot tell the difference between the principle of 1916 and the assumption of 1911 (Refs. [11][12][13]. 10 In view of the charge-mass interaction, Einstein's equivalence principle is clearly inadequate.…”

Section: Validity Of Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its MImentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, due to their reputations of excellence, errors relating to such institutes are often overlooked by many editors, and a paper criticizing such errors would often be rejected. Consequently, errors accumulated and ironically they become the usual sources of errors in general relativity 12,19,21,22,24,26. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Could Galileo be wrong?

Lo¹

2011

Physics Essays

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The free falling of a neutral capacitor, though more massive after charged, would be slower. Thus, the claim of Galileo that neutral objects of different masses would fall with the same speed at vacuum is not always true. Nevertheless, the equivalence between gravitational and inertial masses would still be valid. Moreover, Einstein's equivalence principle, which has been misrepresented with distortion to become invalid by the Wheeler School, actually is generally valid, although the charge-mass repulsive force unequivocally shows that acceleration is intrinsically not generally just related to attractive gravity. To verify the equivalence of masses, new experiments should be conducted when the charge-mass interaction is present. To this end, first the experimental confirmation of the details, such as the distance dependence, of such a repulsive force between charge and mass is needed; and this is also a crucial test for general relativity.Résumé: La chute libre d'un condensateur neutre, bien qu'étant plus massif après avoir été chargé, serait plus lente. Par conséquent, la proposition de Galilée que les objets neutres de masses différentes tomberaient à la même vitesse dans le vide, n'est pas toujours exacte. Néanmoins, l'équivalence entre les masses gravitationnelles et inertielles resterait valable. De plus, le principe d'équivalence d'Einstein, qui a été mal représenté avec distorsion pour devenir non valable selon l'Ecole de Wheeler, est en fait généralement valable bien que la force de répulsion charge-masse démontre sans équivoque que l'accélération est intrinsèquement non pas simplement rattachée à la gravité d'attraction, en générale. Pour vérifier l'équivalence des masses, de nouvelles expériences devraient être entreprises où l'interaction de la charge-masse est présente. Dans ce but, en premier lieu la confirmation expérimentale des détails, tels que la dépendance de la distance, d'une telle force de répulsion entre la charge et la masse est nécessaire; et ceci est également un test crucial pour la relativité générale.

show abstract

Section: The Conflict Between Einstein's Covariance Principle Andmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Validity Of Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its MImentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Validity Of Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its MImentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Validity Of Einstein's Equivalence Principle and Its MImentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Could Galileo be wrong?

Lo¹

2011

Physics Essays

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A new perspective on relativistic transformation: formulation of the differential Lorentz transformation based on first principles

Huang¹

2010

Phys. Scr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The differential Lorentz transformation is formulated solely from the principle of relativity and the invariance of the speed of light. The differential Lorentz transformation transforms physical quantities, instead of space–time coordinates, to keep laws of nature form-invariant among inertial frames. The new relativistic transformation fulfills the principle of relativity, whereas the usual Lorentz transformation of space–time coordinates does not. Furthermore, the new relativistic transformation is compatible with quantum mechanics. The formulation herein provides theoretical foundations for the differential Lorentz transformation as the fundamental relativistic transformation.

show abstract

Differential Lorentz transformation from the principle of relativity with an assumption of invariant speed and impossibility of superluminal motion

Liang¹,

Xu²

2014

Phys. Scr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The differential Lorentz transformation compatible with the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics is analyzed from the principle of relativity with an assumption of invariant speed. The linearity and the possible form of the transformation are determined by the principle of relativity. The principle of relativity allows the existence of an invariant speed, which is also the maximal speed. However, the specific value of the invariant speed can not be derived theoretically and so the existence of an invariant speed is treated as an assumption. The invariant speed should be determined by experiment, which is the light speed in vacuum as is well-known. As the invariant speed is the maximal speed, motion of micro particles can not be superluminal.

show abstract

Relativistic Kinematics I: A Theory of Relativistic Kinematics Based on Physical Reality

Cited by 5 publications

References 2 publications

Could Galileo be wrong?

Could Galileo be wrong?

A new perspective on relativistic transformation: formulation of the differential Lorentz transformation based on first principles

Differential Lorentz transformation from the principle of relativity with an assumption of invariant speed and impossibility of superluminal motion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About