2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.02.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release behavior of water vapor and mass loss from lithium titanate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the amount of chemical absorbed water and generated water per unit surface area for various ceramic breeder materials are shown in Fig. 5 [21,22,[26][27][28]. It can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: (B) and (D))mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the amount of chemical absorbed water and generated water per unit surface area for various ceramic breeder materials are shown in Fig. 5 [21,22,[26][27][28]. It can be seen from Fig.…”
Section: (B) and (D))mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Due to the release of physically adsorbed water and chemically adsorbed water, as well as the reaction between O in the ceramic and H in the purge gas, the presence of water vapor under operating conditions cannot be ignored [21]. Many studies have shown that the presence of water vapor will have a dramatic effect on the form of tritium release, since tritium can be easily transferred into water vapor through isotopic exchange reactions [22]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the Li mass loss of breeding materials will be more severe in water vapor than in H 2 atmosphere [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…around 1100 K to avoid lithium evaporation [8]. Indeed, the relative density of pebbles, which is defined as the ratio of an actual pebble density to a theoretical pebble density, was usually 70 ∼ 90 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%