2003
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Validity of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale in a French-Canadian Sample.

Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a French version of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS). A sample of 2,666 school-age French-Canadian children completed the questionnaire. With regard to factor structure, the 5-factor model found in U.S. normative samples was confirmed. The internal consistency of the 5 scales and of the 2 global scales was good to excellent. Test-retest reliabilities after a 6-month period were also similar to those of the original versio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
66
2
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
66
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, they suggest that the subscales may not represent well-defined or stable factors, and that Performance of the RCMAS in a South African Sample 5 individual items load onto factors that appear inconsistent with the item content (White & Farrell, 2001). Additionally, White and Farrell (2001) argue that although the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the RCMAS has been assessed in a number of languages, including German, Spanish, and French-Canadian samples (Boehnke, Silbereisen, Reynolds, & Richmond, 1986;Ferrando, 1994;Turgeon & Chartrand, 2003), little is known about its performance in more ethnically diverse populations. For researchers working with children in the South African context it is important to evaluate the psychometric properties of the RCMAS in South African samples.…”
Section: Performance Of the Rcmas In A South African Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, they suggest that the subscales may not represent well-defined or stable factors, and that Performance of the RCMAS in a South African Sample 5 individual items load onto factors that appear inconsistent with the item content (White & Farrell, 2001). Additionally, White and Farrell (2001) argue that although the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the RCMAS has been assessed in a number of languages, including German, Spanish, and French-Canadian samples (Boehnke, Silbereisen, Reynolds, & Richmond, 1986;Ferrando, 1994;Turgeon & Chartrand, 2003), little is known about its performance in more ethnically diverse populations. For researchers working with children in the South African context it is important to evaluate the psychometric properties of the RCMAS in South African samples.…”
Section: Performance Of the Rcmas In A South African Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants underwent an intellectual evaluation, using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III (WISC-III) short form (Kaufman et al 1996). Using ageappropriate self-report instruments, all participants were screened for levels of anxiety [Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (R-CMAS) ; Turgeon & Chartrand, 2003 ;French version, 1999] and depression [Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) ; SaintLaurent, 1990]. …”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incremental validity of the CASI-R over other commonly used anxiety measure has yet to be demonstrated. Examples of measures that it would be interesting to incorporate into future investigations of the validity of the CASI-R include the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC; Turgeon, Chartrand, Robaey, & Gauthier, 2006) and the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS; Turgeon & Chartrand, 2003b). And thirdly, the CASI-R's reliability in this study is limited to internal consistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%