1981
DOI: 10.1109/irps.1981.362965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Aspects of a Floating Gate E2 PROM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first glance, such charges should result in a constant shift of both V T levels, while the actual behavior features a milder dependence on N C by the programmed V T with respect to the erased one, pointing toward an interplay among different mechanisms. This picture is confirmed by early results on different non-volatile memory technologies, where different P/E schemes (i.e., different electron injection conditions into the oxide) resulted in different V T dependences on N C [70]. A thorough analysis of the phenomenon was first conducted in [71], using charge-pumping and V T measurements to assess the roles of interface and oxide charges, and was later corroborated by subsequent studies [72].…”
Section: Endurancementioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At first glance, such charges should result in a constant shift of both V T levels, while the actual behavior features a milder dependence on N C by the programmed V T with respect to the erased one, pointing toward an interplay among different mechanisms. This picture is confirmed by early results on different non-volatile memory technologies, where different P/E schemes (i.e., different electron injection conditions into the oxide) resulted in different V T dependences on N C [70]. A thorough analysis of the phenomenon was first conducted in [71], using charge-pumping and V T measurements to assess the roles of interface and oxide charges, and was later corroborated by subsequent studies [72].…”
Section: Endurancementioning
confidence: 55%
“…In particular, it was found that a ten-year retention requirement could be satisfied with a minimum tunnel oxide thickness around 3.5-4.5 nm [56,165], much thinner than the 7-8 nm usually adopted. However, the oxide thickness has barely scaled over the many Flash technology generations, remaining far away from its theoretical limit, because it was soon realized [70,166,167] that repeated P/E cycles led to degradation of the tunnel oxide characteristics, enhanced leakage and worse retention. The enhanced oxide leakage at low fields after electrical stress is known as stress-induced leakage current, or SILC [168,169].…”
Section: Retention After Cycling and Silcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The floating gate was patterned to achieve a gate coupling coefficient of 0.86, where the gate coupling coefficient is defined as interpoly dielectric capacitance divided by total capacitance.8 After the formation of the 140 A interpoly oxide, 1500 A of amorphous silicon was deposited for the control gate layer and doped by phosphorous ion implantation. The floating gate stack was patterned by reactive ion etch (RIE), and symmetric junctions were formed by ion implantation of 5 )< 1014 cm2 phosphorus at 10 key and annealed for 15 contact metal were deposited, and the devices were annealed in forming gas. The interpoly oxide was formed either by a high temperature furnace oxidation or by low thermal budget RTCVD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains why the oxide layer on the tip reduces the emission current by approximately three orders of magnitude. When emitted, some electrons may be trapped in the potential well of the oxide vacuum interface, and some in the bulk oxide electron traps [7,9,18]. These trapped electrons reduce the oxide field and can be another cause of the initial decrease of the emission current.…”
Section: Emission Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%