2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability assessment of passive isolation condenser system of AHWR using APSRA methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top event for the fault tree is considered as passive system functional failures (for example, passive system unable to maintain the clad temperature below certain threshold) and the basic events are malfunctioning or failed component states. To reduce the uncertainty in code predictions, APSRA methodology suggests relying on experimental data from integral test facilities as well as from separate effect tests (Nayak et al, 2009). Figure 2 illustrates the steps followed in APSRA methodology.…”
Section: Frontiers In Energy Research | Nuclear Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top event for the fault tree is considered as passive system functional failures (for example, passive system unable to maintain the clad temperature below certain threshold) and the basic events are malfunctioning or failed component states. To reduce the uncertainty in code predictions, APSRA methodology suggests relying on experimental data from integral test facilities as well as from separate effect tests (Nayak et al, 2009). Figure 2 illustrates the steps followed in APSRA methodology.…”
Section: Frontiers In Energy Research | Nuclear Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive systems seem to offer several advantages in terms of safety and reliability [Nayak et al 2009] [ . For this reason, they are considered in the design of innovative and advanced nuclear reactor concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive systems are expected to contribute significantly to nuclear safety by combining peculiar characteristics of simplicity, reduction of human interaction and reduction or avoidance of external electrical power and signals input [Nayak et al, 2008a and b;Nayak et al, 2009]. On the other hand, the assessment of the effectiveness of passive systems must include considerations on their reliability; these have to be drawn in the face of lack of data on some underlying phenomena, scarce or null operating experience of these systems over the wide range of conditions encountered during operation and less guaranteed performance as compared to active safety systems [Pagani et al, 2005;Burgazzi, 2007a].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactor (HWR) [Nayak et al, 2008a and b;Nayak et al, 2009]. 1 Notice that in the following, the discussion will focus on Type B passive systems, i.e., those involving moving working fluids and referred to as T-H passive systems; thus, the locution "passive system" will implicitly mean "T-H passive system" in the remainder of the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%