2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14366-3_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability-Driven, Spatially-Adaptive Regularization for Deformable Registration

Abstract: Abstract. We propose a reliability measure that identifies informative image cues useful for registration, and present a novel, data-driven approach to spatially adapt regularization to the local image content via use of the proposed measure. We illustrate the generality of this adaptive regularization approach within a powerful discrete optimization framework and present various ways to construct a spatially varying regularization weight based on the proposed measure. We evaluate our approach within the regis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few formulations of the traditional MRF for solving the discrete registration problem. When the smoothing term Ψ ij is a metric, the MRF energy can efficiently be optimized using graph cuts [10,8]. For more complex interaction terms, Glocker et al [9] use a linear programming method (based on the primal-dual principle).…”
Section: Discrete Formulation For the Random Walker Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are few formulations of the traditional MRF for solving the discrete registration problem. When the smoothing term Ψ ij is a metric, the MRF energy can efficiently be optimized using graph cuts [10,8]. For more complex interaction terms, Glocker et al [9] use a linear programming method (based on the primal-dual principle).…”
Section: Discrete Formulation For the Random Walker Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One other way of imposing regularization is to restrict the space of deformations to a Sobolev space [6]. Some effort has been made to adapt the regularization of deformations to local image content [7,8]. This is particularly important considering that different tissue deform differently and parts of the image might contain an abnormality that does not match the atlas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, registration approaches that represent transformations in the discrete domain have arisen [5,3,12,13]. In discrete approaches every pixel (or voxel) is assigned a displacement vector from a predefined set, referred to as a discrete transformation, allowing the image registration energy to be formulated as a Markov random field (MRF) and well established optimization techniques such as graph cuts [2] to be utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A useful feature of RWIR is that it seamlessly allows for spatially adaptive regularization weights, which have been shown to improve registration accuracy compared to a constant regularization weight [12]. However, it is not clear a priori how much regularization is required in RWIR to ensure topology preservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rigid registration, the influence of mismatching regions can be drastically reduced by cropping the image distance function, e.g., by using Tukey's biweight instead of squared error as an instance of robust statistics [17]. In non-rigid registration, one can estimate a local measure of image data reliability to spatially adapt the strength of regularization [18], while in atlas-based registration this information can equally be derived from atlas statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%