98.5Sn0.5Ag1Cu0.05Mn (SAC0510M) exhibits a melting behavior similar to SAC105. It is two times better than SAC105 in the dynamic bending test; more than 8 times better in the modified JEDEC drop test; and more than 40-60% better in the -55 C/125 C thermal cycling test. The reduced hardness and much thinner and stable IMC layer on Ni are responsible for the superior nonfragility, while the stabilized IMC and microstructure are responsible for the thermal cycling performance. A thinner IMC layer on Ni is more important than reduced hardness in improving non-fragility. The thermal cycling performance of SAC0510M may override SAC305. A high Tg brittle board causes poor drop test results due to pad cratering.
INTRODUCTIONLead-free soldering has been widely adopted by the electronics industry, with SnAgCu (SAC) having high Ag content being the initial main stream of choice. This selection was later challenged due to the fragility of solder joints toward drop and the high cost of Ag. Low Ag SAC was considered to be a solution for resolving both issues. However, this approach compromised temperature cycling performance, making it unacceptable for high end applications. Previously, a low Ag SAC alloy doped with Mn, SACM™, was reported to have considerable improvement in shock resistance and thermal fatigue performance. In this study, a second generation alloy within the SACM family was developed with significantly more improvement. It was evaluated against SAC105 for JEDEC22B111 drop, dynamic bending test, and IPC-9701 -55/125 C temperature cycling. The improvement essentially eliminated the need for underfilling for BGA and CSP on mobile devices, and the results are presented and discussed.