2013
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2226892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable All-Pairs Evolving Fuzzy Classifiers

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel design of evolving fuzzy classifiers (EFCs) to handle online multiclass classification problems in a data-streaming context. Therefore, we exploit the concept of all-pairs (AP), a.k.a. all-versus-all, classification using binary classifiers for each pair of classes. This benefits from less complex decision boundaries to be learned, as opposed to a direct multiclass approach, and achieves a higher efficiency in terms of incremental training time than one-versus-rest classificat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies' measurement of the quality of rules after their merging or splitting is very appealing and an interesting point of view that can further enhance our work. Furthermore, recent research Lughofer and Buchtala [49] suggests that the usage of all-pairs architecture outperforms the multi-model architecture that we use in this work. Thus, we want to explore this modeling and possibly incorporate it into our solutions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These studies' measurement of the quality of rules after their merging or splitting is very appealing and an interesting point of view that can further enhance our work. Furthermore, recent research Lughofer and Buchtala [49] suggests that the usage of all-pairs architecture outperforms the multi-model architecture that we use in this work. Thus, we want to explore this modeling and possibly incorporate it into our solutions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The computational expense recorded the calculation time of the posterior probability estimates p 0 ðx i Þ and p 1 ðx i Þ for all samples x i including the minimization of EðnÞ for the optimal reference set size parameter n. The recognition accuracy was determined in terms of the detection and false alarm rates defined in Eqs. (20) and (21), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves generated by the P D -P FA graphs was computed.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the spectrum of statistical learning algorithms requiring various degrees of guidance from available data, supervised pattern classification algorithms such as the nearest neighbor rule [6,9], support vector machines [5,25], artificial neural networks [12], discriminant functions [21], and fuzzy classifiers [1,18,20] have enjoyed a particularly wide audience ranging from object recognition to biomedical data analysis. Such a far-reaching pertinence can be attributed to the ability of these algorithms to construct decision rules based on a given set of training samples for which the desired decisions are already available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach, based on fuzzy classifiers [38][39][40], uses a fuzzy classifier learning algorithm to create rules from data with noise. For instance, fuzzy classifiers eClass and FLEXFIS-Class [41] can be used with different model architectures for solving one-class problems.…”
Section: Rule-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%