2016
DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1154625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliable network design under supply uncertainty with probabilistic guarantees

Abstract: This paper proposes a bi-level risk averse network design model for transportation networks with heterogeneous link travel time distributions. The objective of the network design is to minimize the total system travel time budget, which consists of the mean total system travel time and a safety margin. The design is achieved by selecting optimal link capacity expansions subject to a fixed expansion budget. Users' selfish behavior and risk attitude are captured in the lower-level traffic assignment constraints,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tourists start from the starting point t S and visit the scenic spots. When the cost of sightseeing in each scenic spot is confirmed and fixed, the cost on the way is an important criterion to determine the quality of the tourist routes [7,8]. Therefore, the problem is transformed into finding the route with the lowest cost based on the given p number of scenic spots.…”
Section: Tourism Route Planning Algorithm Based On the Probability Sc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tourists start from the starting point t S and visit the scenic spots. When the cost of sightseeing in each scenic spot is confirmed and fixed, the cost on the way is an important criterion to determine the quality of the tourist routes [7,8]. Therefore, the problem is transformed into finding the route with the lowest cost based on the given p number of scenic spots.…”
Section: Tourism Route Planning Algorithm Based On the Probability Sc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one or certain ones of tourist sights in a tour route cannot conform to the interests and needs of the tourist, or if they cannot provide the expected tour experience for tourists, then this tour route will directly influence tourist's total feel and experience on the whole trip, decrease the satisfaction degree and finally negatively influence tourist's evaluation on the tourism city as well as its tourists sights. The long-term consequence will be the negative decisions of subsequent tourists [39][40][41][42]. Thus, tour route planning should firstly lay emphasis on precise tourist sight mining to ensure each one of the tourist sight in the tour route conforms to tourists' interests and needs.…”
Section: Optimal Tour Route Planning Algorithm Based On Interest Labelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the travel behavior of users concerning transit lines and frequencies is modeled by a transit assignment sub-model, which is necessary to measure the performance of the network design strategy (Cancela et al 2015). Hence, the MTNDP is usually modeled as a bi-level programming problem (BLPP) (Szeto and Jiang 2014;Szeto et al 2015;Szeto and Wang 2016), where the upper-level problem optimizes the transit network based on feasibility constraints by the planner, and the lower-level problem describes the response of passengers to the designed scenarios by the upper-level.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%