Religious Identification and Moral Attitudes: The British Case

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Wiley-Blackwell andThe London School of Economics and Political Science are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The British Journal of Sociology. ABSTRACTBritish society is currently embroiled in a variety of controversial social issues. An identifiable set of these disputes concerning artificial insemination, AIDS victims homosexual rights, and pornography are all debated as moral issues. This study examines the impact of religious identification on public attitudes in relation to these moral issues. The results show a marked variation in patterns of religious identification and significant differences in relation to moral attitudes. Religious non-affiliates are more supportive of AIDS victims, less disapproving of homosexuals, and less likely to espouse a more conservative view in relation to either artificial insemination methods or pornography than their religious affiliates. Multivariate analyses, however, suggests that religious identification only affects certain types of moral issues, namely attitudes towards AIDS victims, homosexuals, and pornography. When various other factors are controlled, religious non-affiliates are generally more supportive of AIDS victims, homosexuals, and the public availability of pornography than religious affiliates. Furthermore, with the one exception of pornography, this relationship remained regardless of whether Independent Apostates or Stable Independents are considered. Thus, for these issues at least, it is the lack of religious identification per se, or current religious independence, which constitutes one primary factor in explaining moral attitudes. INTRODUGTIONThe issue of moral values has intensified in Britain over the last decade. Rising divorce rates, one-parent families, abortion, homosexuality, and pornography have all been cited as indices of a nation facing moral and religious collapse. Moral conservatives struggle with liberal modernists over these issues in popular media, political arenas, BJS Vofuteno.46 Issueno.3 Sq1995 ISSN0007-1315 )LondonSchoofofEconomscsl995

Attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, bisexual women, and bisexual men in Germany

“…The variable that has drawn the most attention is participant sex. The finding that men's attitudes are less favorable than women's is parsimonious (Hayes, 1995;Larsen et al, 1980;Steffens, in press). When target sex is specified, men's attitudes toward gay men also are more unfavorable than women's (for a review, see Kite & Whitley, 1996).…”

“Religious Nones” in the United Kingdom: How Atheists and Agnostics Think about Religion and Politics

“…Earlier research also found that the religiously-affiliated were more likely to hold socially-conservative opinions on similar moral questions, compared to the unaffiliated (Hayes 1995).…”

Turkish Family Members’ Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men

“…Considering the fact that a conservative attitude in discussing sexual matters among family members is apparent in Turkish families (Eksi 1982;Necef 1999), it is reasonable to expect that Turkish parents and their children will differ considerably in their attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Furthermore, previous research has consistently determined that younger age cohorts are typically more tolerant of homosexuality than those from older age cohorts (Hayes 1995;Jensen et al 1998). Based on the previous research, the same pattern is expected to be observed in the current sample.…”