2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00653.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of exhaled particles by ventilation and deposition in a multibed airborne infection isolation room

Abstract: Our findings of the relatively poor performance of fine-particle removal by the existing CDC design of isolation room ventilation suggests a need for improvement, and the findings of the removal of large particles by deposition, not by ventilation, suggest that floor-level exhausts are unnecessary, and that regular surface cleaning and disinfection is necessary, thus providing evidence for maintaining isolation room surface hygiene.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
114
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
114
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with modeling results reported by Knibbs et al, (28) although they and other authors also found that the configuration and direction of the ventilation system, and other factors, can have a large impact on exposure and that these factors are difficult to predict and control. (17,29,30) In a similar manner to the time scale discussion above, our results show that ventilation has a much greater effect on exposure over the long term than in the short period immediately after a cough.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with modeling results reported by Knibbs et al, (28) although they and other authors also found that the configuration and direction of the ventilation system, and other factors, can have a large impact on exposure and that these factors are difficult to predict and control. (17,29,30) In a similar manner to the time scale discussion above, our results show that ventilation has a much greater effect on exposure over the long term than in the short period immediately after a cough.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In two studies, Qian et al (16,17) placed manikins in a mock hospital ward and airborne isolation room and showed that the air jet from patient exhalation, airflows from the ventilation system, and respiratory activities of other individuals in the room interact to distribute aerosol particles. They also found that exhaled jets can travel long distances in some cases, and that commonly used room ventilation schemes are not effective at removing all sizes of aerosol particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To implement appropriate infection control measures and prevent the transmission of contagious diseases from a patient to other people or from outsiders, such as health care personnel and visitors, to the susceptible patient, hospitals must have Airborne Infection Isolation Room (AIIR) which is a safe and healthy environment for patients with infectious diseases [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study in an air cabin by Sze found that the high mass of deposited expiratory aerosols (60%-70% mass of the dye found in air cabin) indicated that the risk from indirect contact transmission is also significant, besides risk from airborne particles. Qian and Li (2010) conducted an experimental and numerical study in a six-bed airborne infection isolation room with downward ventilation (as recommended by Center for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC). Based on the results, they stated that systems with only ceiling-level exhausts can remove gaseous pollutants and fine particles in an isolation room more efficiently than systems with only floor-level exhausts or systems with exhausts at both levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%