2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of hexavalent chromium via biochar-based adsorbents: State-of-the-art, challenges, and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 329 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific microstructure allows the interaction with different pollutants by electrostatic forces, non-covalent forces, or hydrophobic interactions, and different carbon nanostructures (carbon nanotubes, graphene, graphite, and activated carbon) have been widely employed [ 8 ]. Along with their high adsorption capacity, associated with a high surface area, the versatility of carbon adsorbents is linked to the possibility to be obtained by different low-cost procedures (e.g., biomass pyrolysis) [ 9 ]. However, the decantation and separation of the adsorbent from the aqueous media and its reuse after subsequent treatment cycles represents a current technological issue in the search of cost-effective processes [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific microstructure allows the interaction with different pollutants by electrostatic forces, non-covalent forces, or hydrophobic interactions, and different carbon nanostructures (carbon nanotubes, graphene, graphite, and activated carbon) have been widely employed [ 8 ]. Along with their high adsorption capacity, associated with a high surface area, the versatility of carbon adsorbents is linked to the possibility to be obtained by different low-cost procedures (e.g., biomass pyrolysis) [ 9 ]. However, the decantation and separation of the adsorbent from the aqueous media and its reuse after subsequent treatment cycles represents a current technological issue in the search of cost-effective processes [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromium (VI) possibly can be reduced to Cr (III) by using several reductive chemical agents that can be moved out by surface-active adsorbents like Soya cake or Dissolution by LiCl, carbonnano-Onions (CNOs), [44,45]. High efficiency for the reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) when the value of pH < 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sorbents, such as biomaterials, zeolites, metal oxides, activated carbon, bio-sorbents, and activated alumina clay, have been extensively utilized for Pb 2+ ion removal. [19][20][21] Furthermore, all of these traditional sorbents exhibited low adsorption capacity for Pb removal. 22 Two-dimensional materials have been utilized to remove heavy metals, dyes, and pharmaceuticals from wastewater via the adsorption technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sorbents, such as biomaterials, zeolites, metal oxides, activated carbon, bio-sorbents, and activated alumina clay, have been extensively utilized for Pb 2+ ion removal. 19–21 Furthermore, all of these traditional sorbents exhibited low adsorption capacity for Pb removal. 22…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%