2010
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2010.1540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of metsulfuron methyl by granular activated carbon adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… S. no. Adsorbents Adsorption capacity (Q max ) (mg/g) References 1 Pectin-iron oxide 48.99 10 2 Chitosan-bound Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles 21.5 41 3 Aminated polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats 30.40 29 4 Carbon nanotubes 24.49 42 5 Carboxylmethyl-β-cyclodextrinconjugated magnetics nanoparticle 47.29 43 6 Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles coated with humic acid 46.3 44 7 Magnetic gamma-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles coated with poly-l-cysteine 42.9 45 8 Magnetic nano-adsorbent modified by gum arabic 38.5 46 9 Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles 36.9 47 10 Maghemite nanoparticle 27.7 48 11 Amino-functionalized magnetic nanosorbent 25.77 49 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… S. no. Adsorbents Adsorption capacity (Q max ) (mg/g) References 1 Pectin-iron oxide 48.99 10 2 Chitosan-bound Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles 21.5 41 3 Aminated polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats 30.40 29 4 Carbon nanotubes 24.49 42 5 Carboxylmethyl-β-cyclodextrinconjugated magnetics nanoparticle 47.29 43 6 Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles coated with humic acid 46.3 44 7 Magnetic gamma-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles coated with poly-l-cysteine 42.9 45 8 Magnetic nano-adsorbent modified by gum arabic 38.5 46 9 Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles 36.9 47 10 Maghemite nanoparticle 27.7 48 11 Amino-functionalized magnetic nanosorbent 25.77 49 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%