2022
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Removal of persistent organic pollutants and disinfection of pathogens from secondary treated municipal wastewater using advanced oxidation processes

Abstract: An affordable and sustainable tertiary treatment is imperative to solve the secondary contamination issues related to wastewater reuse. To decontaminate and disinfect the actual secondary treated wastewater, various types of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been studied. The optimization of the oxidant and catalyst is carried out to identify the best-performing system. Under selected experimental conditions, UV/PMS, O3/PMS, UV/MnO2, O3/MnO2, UV/O3/H2O2, O3/MnO2/H2O2, UV/MnO2/H2O2, and UV/O3/MnO2 has id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20–22 This process is simple, efficient, and environmentally benign. Ganesh Kumar et al 23 used a combination of UV/Fe 2+ /H 2 O 2 for the treatment of persistent organic pollutants in secondary treated municipal wastewater (the physicochemical characteristics of the tested wastewater: pH: 7.8 ± 0.6, COD: 43 ± 24, BOD: 4–26), which was able to achieve 100% COD removal and complete inactivation of pathogens within 10 minutes. However, disadvantages such as high chemical consumption, narrow pH range and the large amount of iron sludge produced limit the development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20–22 This process is simple, efficient, and environmentally benign. Ganesh Kumar et al 23 used a combination of UV/Fe 2+ /H 2 O 2 for the treatment of persistent organic pollutants in secondary treated municipal wastewater (the physicochemical characteristics of the tested wastewater: pH: 7.8 ± 0.6, COD: 43 ± 24, BOD: 4–26), which was able to achieve 100% COD removal and complete inactivation of pathogens within 10 minutes. However, disadvantages such as high chemical consumption, narrow pH range and the large amount of iron sludge produced limit the development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%