2015
DOI: 10.1177/0191453714565502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renegotiating Indonesian secularism through debates on Ahmadiyya and Shia

Abstract: Commentators have mainly viewed the Ahmadiyya debate in Indonesia either as a controversy over heterodoxy or as an episode raising questions about the human rights of ‘religious minorities’. Instead, I suggest viewing these debates as a field of normative questions of secularism in which the claims of religious are renegotiated in response to the fragmentation of religious and political authority brought on by a diversification of the use of media and a loss of trust in the Indonesian post-Suharto democracy, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The involvement of the state and local government in the Sunni-Shia conflict, together with major religious groups such as Nahdatul Ulama, has significantly shaped the context of this intra-faith conflict (and associated collective violence). This response by local government state and major religious group (s) to the conflict and their stance vis-à-vis Shi`as communities seems to have become a model for the political approach to sectarianism and intra-faith conflict relationships in Indonesia (Formichi 2014;Schafer 2015). This appears to reflect Van Dijk's arguments that communal violence in Indonesia, particularly religious clashes, often involve military and social group, including political parties or social organizations that are closely affiliated with religious identities (Islam, for instance) and social class (Dijk 2002).…”
Section: Becoming Internally Displaced Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The involvement of the state and local government in the Sunni-Shia conflict, together with major religious groups such as Nahdatul Ulama, has significantly shaped the context of this intra-faith conflict (and associated collective violence). This response by local government state and major religious group (s) to the conflict and their stance vis-à-vis Shi`as communities seems to have become a model for the political approach to sectarianism and intra-faith conflict relationships in Indonesia (Formichi 2014;Schafer 2015). This appears to reflect Van Dijk's arguments that communal violence in Indonesia, particularly religious clashes, often involve military and social group, including political parties or social organizations that are closely affiliated with religious identities (Islam, for instance) and social class (Dijk 2002).…”
Section: Becoming Internally Displaced Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selain itu, perdebatan seputar kebebasan beragama dan undang-undang penistaan agama menyoroti keseimbangan yang rumit antara menjunjung tinggi hak asasi manusia dan menghormati kepekaan agama (Hasani & Halili, 2022). Negosiasi ulang sekularisme melalui diskusi tentang minoritas agama seperti komunitas Ahmadiyah dan Syiah mencerminkan dialog yang sedang berlangsung di Indonesia tentang pluralisme dan toleransi agama (Schäfer, 2015).…”
Section: Evolusi Konstruksi Agama DI Indonesia: Dari Prasejarah Hingg...unclassified
“…This might takes the form of institutional decree, suppression, religious legitimacy, and so on. The ambiguous role of religion in the Indonesian political sphere enables this to happen by conferring those organizations the opportunity to shape their social authority in vying with political institutions (Schäfer, 2015).…”
Section: Mosque Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%