2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0143385707000892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renormalization of vector fields and Diophantine invariant tori

Abstract: Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0143385707000892 How to cite this article: HANS KOCH and SAŠA KOCIĆ (2008). Renormalization of vector elds and Diophantine invariant tori.Abstract. We extend the renormalization group techniques that were developed originally for Hamiltonian flows to more general vector fields on T d × R . Each Diophantine vector ω ∈ R d determines an analytic manifold W of infinitely renormalizable vector fields, and each vector field on W is shown to have an elli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of renormalization originally came from statistical mechanics, where it provided an explanation for critical phenomena, by classifying systems into different universality classes, according to their scaling limits and corresponding critical exponents. In dynamics, apart from providing an explanation for the universality of infinitely renormalizable unimodal maps, renormalization methods have also led to advances in rigidity theory [4,5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]29], complex dynamics [27,30], KAM (Kolmogorov-Arnol'd-Moser) theory [20][21][22], break-up of invariant tori [1,25], and the reducibility of cocycles and skew-product flows [3,23].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of renormalization originally came from statistical mechanics, where it provided an explanation for critical phenomena, by classifying systems into different universality classes, according to their scaling limits and corresponding critical exponents. In dynamics, apart from providing an explanation for the universality of infinitely renormalizable unimodal maps, renormalization methods have also led to advances in rigidity theory [4,5,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]29], complex dynamics [27,30], KAM (Kolmogorov-Arnol'd-Moser) theory [20][21][22], break-up of invariant tori [1,25], and the reducibility of cocycles and skew-product flows [3,23].…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In higher-dimensional problems, the question of the weakest possible condition is a fundamental open problem. Recently, we have developed a renormalization group approach to the construction of invariant tori with Brjuno frequency vectors for vector fields on T d × R m [16], using two general theorems, a normal form theorem and a stable manifold theorem, that we proved in [15]. The main objective of this paper is to extend the renormalization methods developed in [16] in order to construct analytic lower-dimensional tori of near-integrable Hamiltonian systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [15], we constructed a renormalization scheme using a sequence of scaling matrices T ∈ SL(d, Z) generated by a multidimensional continued fraction algorithm introduced by Khanin, Lopes Dias and Marklof [11], and based on an algorithm by Lagarias [21]. The results of [11] provide good bounds in the case of Diophantine vectors ω, and allowed for the extension of the results of [17] for two degree of freedom Hamiltonians to higher dimensions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in those works the renormalizations are based on the continued fraction expansion of irrational numbers. Here we are able to work on higher dimensions by making use of the multidimensional continued fractions algorithm introduced in [13] (see also [12,17,18]). This roughly corresponds to a flow on the homogeneous space SL(d, Z) \ SL(d, R) that, following Lagarias ideas [19], provides a strongly convergent continued fractions expansion for all vectors (see Section 2 below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%