1987
DOI: 10.1063/1.866100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reply to comments of Hill

Abstract: Hill notes that the calculated energy loss rate for a lightning channel found in the original paper [Phys. Fluids 29, 2736 (1986)] is significantly smaller than the rate he obtained. This is explained primarily by his much smaller electrical conductivity. The value obtained in the original paper is justified and other features of the results are clarified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Plooster (1971) and Paxton et al (1986) both avoided the use of an optimal return stroke current model in favor of a more simplified current source that had a linear rise to peak followed by an exponential decay.…”
Section: B Channel Currentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, Plooster (1971) and Paxton et al (1986) both avoided the use of an optimal return stroke current model in favor of a more simplified current source that had a linear rise to peak followed by an exponential decay.…”
Section: B Channel Currentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In other words, apart from cooling due to channel expansion, we neglect all other cooling mechanisms. Some of these mechanisms have been examined by other investigators: thermal conduction (Braginskii 1958), turbulent mixing (Picone et al 1981), and radiation (Paxton et al 1986). However, there is still debate in the literature as to which of these cooling mechanisms are most important (e.g., Hill 1987;Paxton et al 1987).…”
Section: Simplifying Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After the publication of Paxton et al [] on the optical radiation of lightning return strokes, criticisms from Hill [1987] were published, followed by a reply from Paxton et al []. The main critique of Hill [1987] is related to the fact that 69% of the total energy is radiated away by Paxton's model, which according to his analysis is certainly too high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%