2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-015-2878-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representation of monsoon intraseasonal oscillations in regional climate model: sensitivity to convective physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1g), which differ only in the cumulus scheme (Table 2), were compared to test the sensitivity of the WRF-simulated precipitation to the cumulus scheme used in the model. Not surprisingly, the comparison shows the model-simulated precipitation to be sensitive to the cumulus parameterization scheme, in agreement with the previous studies of Mukhopadhyay et al (2010), Srinivas et al (2013) Raju et al (2015), and Umakanth et al (2016). We calculated the root mean square error (RMSE; Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Cumulus Parameterization Schemessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1g), which differ only in the cumulus scheme (Table 2), were compared to test the sensitivity of the WRF-simulated precipitation to the cumulus scheme used in the model. Not surprisingly, the comparison shows the model-simulated precipitation to be sensitive to the cumulus parameterization scheme, in agreement with the previous studies of Mukhopadhyay et al (2010), Srinivas et al (2013) Raju et al (2015), and Umakanth et al (2016). We calculated the root mean square error (RMSE; Fig.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Cumulus Parameterization Schemessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Several studies have shown that RCMs are capable of realistically simulating the Indian summer monsoon precipitation at seasonal (Jacob & Podzum 1997, Vernekar & Ji 1999 as well as at subseasonal (Maharana & Dimri 2016, Umakanth et al 2016) time scales. However, the simulated precipitation has been found to be sensitive to the cumulus parameterization schemes used in the RCMs (Ratnam & Kumar 2005, Dash et al 2006, Mukhopadhyay et al 2010, Raju et al 2015, Umakanth et al 2016 at both seasonal and sub-seasonal time scales. A few studies, such as that of Shrivastava et al (2014), highlight the importance of choosing a suitable combination of parameterization schemes within the WRF model to simulate the features over the Indian region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many decades, however, a number of regional atmosphere modelling studies of the ISM forced with global atmospheric reanalysis has also been conducted with varied success (Bhaskaran et al ., ; Ji and Vernekar, ; VenkataRatnam and Krishna Kumar, ; Dash et al ., ; Saeed et al ., , ; Umakant et al ., ). A reverberating message from many of these studies is that higher resolution of the regional atmospheric model provides a more realistic simulation of the ISM through better representation of the orography, land‐ocean coastlines, vegetation cover, and land use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our understanding of ISO and its governing mechanisms have improved in recent times, modeling of ISO still remains a difficult task and many state-of-the-art models perform poorly in simulating the basic structure of ISO (Sabeerali et al, 2013;Sperber et al, 2013). Recently, usage of RCM has increased in view of enhanced representation of orography, coastlines, and land cover among many other factors, which enable better representation of seasonal mean and monsoon variability (Dash et al, 2006;Misra et al, 2018;Raju et al, 2015;Umakanth et al, 2016). Misra et al (2018) investigated the performance of a high-resolution regional coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model and found that the model produces reasonable spatiotemporal structure, propagation characteristics, and amplitude of the ISO as compared to 10.1029/2019JD031648 Table 1 Physics Used in the RCM Simulation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%