2015
DOI: 10.1111/micc.12196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reproducibility of Cutaneous Vascular Conductance Responses to Slow Local Heating Assessed Using seven‐Laser Array Probes

Abstract: Objective. Gradual local heating of the skin induces a largely nitric oxide(NO)-mediated vasodilatation. However, use of this assessment of microvascular health is limited because little is known about its reproducibility.Methods. Healthy volunteers (n=9) reported twice to the laboratory. Cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC), derived from laser Doppler flux and mean arterial pressure, was examined in response to a standardised local heating protocol (0.5ºC per 150s from 33-42ºC, followed by 20-minutes at 44ºC)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data can provide important information on the neural or non-neural control of skin blood flow that may, in turn, provide an index of overall vascular health and function/dysfunction (Holowatz et al 2008). Because of the small area and volume of skin under the laser Doppler flow probe and the inherent heterogeneity of the skin microvasculature, and direct site-to-site and dayto-day comparisons of the raw laser Doppler flux signal are highly variable (Braverman et al 1990;Wardell et al 1994;Dawson et al 2015;Roberts et al 2017). To account for potential anatomical differences, a normalisation process is typically utilised.…”
Section: Laser Doppler Flowmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data can provide important information on the neural or non-neural control of skin blood flow that may, in turn, provide an index of overall vascular health and function/dysfunction (Holowatz et al 2008). Because of the small area and volume of skin under the laser Doppler flow probe and the inherent heterogeneity of the skin microvasculature, and direct site-to-site and dayto-day comparisons of the raw laser Doppler flux signal are highly variable (Braverman et al 1990;Wardell et al 1994;Dawson et al 2015;Roberts et al 2017). To account for potential anatomical differences, a normalisation process is typically utilised.…”
Section: Laser Doppler Flowmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forearm skin SR was determined in an enclosed location by capacitance hygrometry, calculated from the relative humidity and temperature (THP-B3T; Shinei, Japan) of the air flowing out of a 12.56-cm 2 capsule at a rate of 1.5 L/min [29]. The reproducibility of the SBF measurement using the laser-Doppler flowmeter was confirmed in the previous studies (coefficient of variance: ~ 20%) [30][31][32]. The variables described above were converted into digital data by using an analog-to-digital (AD) conversion device and software (PowerLab 8/35, ADInstruments, Colorado Springs, CO, USA) at 1 kHz.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Centimeters per second per second (cm/s/s) T A B L E 1 Cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular variables in nine participants during all NVC assessments at baseline and following 30 minutes of control rest, 25 minutes of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT), 45 minutes of Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT). The main effects (condition, time, and condition x time) are displayed in a single column; however, each is associated with the physiological variable within the respective row 2020; Dawson et al, 2015;Quan & Shih, 1996;Scott et al, 1989;Smirl et al, 2015). Moreover, the ICC estimate was utilized to determine if the within-and between-day reliability was poor (<0.50), moderate (0.50-0.75), good, (0.75-0.90), or excellent (>0.90) (Koo & Li, 2016).…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 99%